ED41A-0832
Comparison of submarine gully morphologies in passive and active margin settings
Abstract:
Passive and active tectonic margins have inherently different hypsometry, due to local patterns ofdeformation and subsequent impacts on the style of sedimentation. One way we can analyze and
compare the two settings is through observation of submarine gullies, which are small channel
features that form along the continental slope as it descends to the ocean floor. By documenting
the geometries of gullies that have formed on passive margins and gullies that have formed on
active margins, we attempt to distinguish differences in gully morphologies in these two settings.
We manually mapped over 600 gullies and interfluves from shaded relief and contour maps
generated from bathymetric data across the globe, including the coast of California, the Beaufort
Sea, and the Black Sea. We extrapolated and plotted elevation profiles of the gullies along their
downslope distance, and compared a range of gully properties, such as length, spacing, and
slope, to look at the correlations among those elements of gullies and their tectonic setting. We
find that gullies forming on active margins show the greatest variability in their slopes,
exhibiting both the steepest and the shallowest slopes of the dataset. The slopes of the passive
margin gullies fall within the range of the active margin gully slopes, but interestingly, we note
patterns in the ranges of gully steepness at different localities. These results differ from our our
anticipation that active margin gullies are steeper than passive margin gullies, but suggest that
gullies in all settings display a variety of morphologies. Additional mapping of active margin
gullies will better determine if there are morphological differences between the two settings.