150 000 Years of Loess Deposition in Interior Alaska as Told by Magnetic Susceptibility

Abstract:

The Halfway House loess deposit in interior Alaska contains a well-studied and complex paleomagnetic and paleoenvironmental record. Unfortunately, a lack of chronologic control has made it difficult to interpret the results of these studies. Detailed reexamination of stratigraphy, paleomagnetics and tephrostratigraphy reveals a relatively complete marine isotope stage (MIS) 6 to Holocene record constrained by the Old Crow (124 ± 10 ka), VT (106 ± 10 ka), Sheep Creek-Klondike (ca. 80 ka), Dominion Creek (77 ± 8 ka) and Dawson (ca. 30.2 cal ka BP) tephras. Two well-developed paleosols are shown to have formed during Marine Isotope Stages (MIS) 5e and 5a, while MIS 5c and 5b are either poorly represented or absent. A magnetic excursion is identified as the post-Blake excursion (94.1 ± 7.8 ka) and provides independent age control while adding to an increasing body of evidence that Alaskan loess is a detailed recorder of variations of the Earth’s magnetic field over time. High-resolution magnetic susceptibility profiles placed into this new chronostratigraphic framework help refine loess deposition models for the interior of Alaska, while providing a means to correlate to previous magnetic studies at this site. The profiles support the hypothesis that wind-intensity is the main variable controlling fluctuations in susceptibility, with the highest susceptibility during peak glacial times and the lowest values in paleosols representing interglacials. However, the correlation of the susceptibility record to global marine d¹⁸O records is complicated by highly variable accumulation rates. We find the lowest rates of accumulation during peak warm and cold stages, while abrupt increases are associated with periods of transition between marine isotope stages, represented by intermediate susceptibility values. Previous accumulation models for Alaska have emphasized the role of surface roughness as an important variable controlling loess accumulation. However our results suggest that while this may be the case during transitions and peak cold periods, the negligible accumulation during the peak warmth of MIS 5e and 5a suggests loess production was exceedingly low, negating the role of surface roughness.