S21A:
Operational Earthquake Forecasting: Scientific Advances, Validation and Implementation, Communication and Uptake I Posters
Submit an Abstract to this Session
Please know the abstract submission deadline has passed. There are no exceptions to this deadline and no new abstracts can be submitted.
S21A:
Operational Earthquake Forecasting: Scientific Advances, Validation and Implementation, Communication and Uptake I Posters
Operational Earthquake Forecasting: Scientific Advances, Validation and Implementation, Communication and Uptake I Posters
You can still search the program to see your colleague�s abstract submissions as well as the sessions submitted for the 2016 Fall Meeting. The final program will be released in early October.
Session ID#: 13049
Session Description:
Earthquakes seldom come alone; they often trigger additional earthquakes that exacerbate existing crises or indeed initiate a disaster. The recent M7 April 15, 2016, Kumamoto, Japan earthquake occurred mere days after two earlier M6 temblors, serving as yet another dramatic example of a so-called aftershock that proved to be more damaging than the initial mainshock. This session focuses on recent progress in operational earthquake forecasting (OEF), which involves the generation and timely dissemination of authoritative information about time-dependent seismic hazard, with the purpose of helping communities prepare for earthquakes. We invite contributions spanning the range of challenges facing OEF. Topics may include: scientific advances in physical and statistical modelling of earthquake triggering, clustering and cascading; validation and evaluation of forecast skill; operationalization and implementation in real-time, including data access issues and uncertainties; best practices for communication; and uptake from existing and potential users of operational forecasts.
Primary Convener: Maximilian J Werner, University of Bristol, School of Earth Sciences and Cabot Institute, Bristol, BS8, United Kingdom
Conveners: Nicholas van der Elst, U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Pasadena, United States, Matt Gerstenberger, GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand and Warner Marzocchi, National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology, Rome, Italy
Chairs: Matt Gerstenberger, GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, Maximilian J Werner, University of Bristol, School of Earth Sciences and Cabot Institute, Bristol, BS8, United Kingdom, Nicholas van der Elst, U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Pasadena, United States and Warner Marzocchi, National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology, Rome, Italy
OSPA Liaison: Maximilian J Werner, University of Bristol, School of Earth Sciences and Cabot Institute, Bristol, BS8, United Kingdom
Cross-Listed:
- G - Geodesy
- NH - Natural Hazards
- SI - Societal Impacts and Policy Sciences
Index Terms:
4334 Disaster risk communication [NATURAL HAZARDS]
6309 Decision making under uncertainty [POLICY SCIENCES]
7212 Earthquake ground motions and engineering seismology [SEISMOLOGY]
7223 Earthquake interaction, forecasting, and prediction [SEISMOLOGY]
Abstracts Submitted to this Session:
The 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake Sequence, A Series of Cross-fault and In-fault Triggering Events (197025)
The Stress Transfer and Seismic Interaction Revealed by the Aftershocks of the 2011 Van Earthquake (173465)
See more of: Seismology
