IN42A:
Reproducible Research in Geosciences with Emphasis on Provenance of Information as an Essential Component I

Submit an Abstract to this Session Please know the abstract submission deadline has passed. There are no exceptions to this deadline and no new abstracts can be submitted.
You can still search the program to see your colleague�s abstract submissions as well as the sessions submitted for the 2016 Fall Meeting. The final program will be released in early October.
Please note: this session is being considered for an alternate session format. Please be aware that if your abstracted is accepted in this session, your abstract may be scheduled as a panel discussion or lightning poster presentation. For more information please visit the following link: http://fallmeeting.agu.org/2016/alternate-session-formats/.


Session ID#: 17063

Session Description:
The presentations in this session will highlight important science reproducibility studies, report on useful methodologies and tools to make science reproducible, identify practical barriers to reproducibility that scientists find, and discuss community efforts and policies to make reproducibility commonplace in geosciences.
Primary Convener:  Clifford A Jacobs, Organization Not Listed, Washington, DC, United States
Conveners:  Kerstin Lehnert, Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, United States, Brooks Hanson, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, United States and Anusuriya Devaraju, CSIRO, Mineral Resources, Kensington, WA, Australia
Chairs:  Anusuriya Devaraju, CSIRO, Mineral Resources, Kensington, WA, Australia, Clifford A Jacobs, Organization Not Listed, Washington, DC, United States, Kerstin Lehnert, Columbia University, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, United States and Brooks Hanson, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Anusuriya Devaraju, CSIRO, Mineral Resources, Kensington, WA, Australia
Index Terms:

1948 Metadata: Provenance [INFORMATICS]
1976 Software tools and services [INFORMATICS]
1978 Software re-use [INFORMATICS]
1998 Workflow [INFORMATICS]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Nature Research journals reproducibility policies and initiatives in the Earth sciences (Invited) (181773)
John C VanDecar, Nature Research, Nature, London, United Kingdom
Software and Workflow Provenance: Documenting Scientific Methods (Invited) (124386)
Yolanda Gil, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Reproducible Research in the Geosciences (Invited) (123991)
Victoria Stodden1, Kyle Chard2, Niall Gaffney3, Matthew B. Jones4, Bertram Ludaescher1, Jaroslaw Nabrzyski5 and Matthew Turk1, (1)University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, (2)University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States, (3)University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States, (4)University of California Santa Barbara, DataONE, Santa Barbara, CA, United States, (5)University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States
Geoscience Australia’s enterprise application of provenance standards and systems for physical and digital objects (Invited) (192994)
Carina Kemp and Nicholas John Car, Geoscience Australia, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Reproducibility in Data-Scarce Environments (189759)
Peter Thomas Darch, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, School of Information Sciences, Urbana, IL, United States
Reproducible Research in the Geosciences at Scale: Achievable Goal or Elusive Dream? (195954)
Lesley A Wyborn, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia and Benjamin James Kingston Evans, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
Provenance as a Core Concept of Spatial Information (128745)
Werner Kuhn, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States
Querying Provenance Information: Basic Notions and an Example from Paleoclimate Reconstruction (191107)
Victoria Stodden1, Bertram Ludaescher1, Kyle Bocinsky2, Keith Kintigh3, Tim Kohler4, Timothy McPhillips1 and Johnathan Rush1, (1)University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, (2)Crow Canyon Archaeological Center, Cortez, CO, United States, (3)Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States, (4)Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
Building a high level sample processing and quality assessment model for biogeochemical measurements: a case study from the ocean acidification community (173866)
Robert Thomas, National Oceanography Centre, British Oceanographic Data Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom, Dave Connell, Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston, Australia, Tobias Spears, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, Canada, Adam Leadbetter, Irish Marine Institute, Ocean Science and Information Services, Galway, Ireland and Eugene F Burger, NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, United States
LiPD and CSciBox: A Case Study in Why Data Standards are Important for Paleoscience (141679)
Elizabeth Bradley1, Izaak Weiss2, Nicholas McKay3, Julien Emile-Geay4, Laura Rassbach de Vesine2, Kenneth A Anderson2, James W C White5 and Thomas M Marchitto Jr6, (1)University of Colorado at Boulder, Computer Science, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)Northern Arizona University, School of Earth and Sustainability, Flagstaff, AZ, United States, (4)University of Southern California, Department of Earth Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (5)Univ Colorado, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, Boulder, CO, United States, (6)Univ Colorado, Boulder, United States

See more of: Earth and Space Science Informatics