IN52A:
Quality and Trustworthiness of Earth Science Data

Submit an Abstract to this Session

eLightning Session: This session will only be in eLightning format, an exciting new format that allows interactive, multimedia, electronic presentations and in-depth discussions. Learn more


Session ID#: 26458

Session Description:
Earth science data quality and trustworthiness remain a big challenge with the growing diversity of datasets, the expanding needs of the scientific community, and scrutiny by public decision/policy-makers. Comprehensive, standardized, and accessible quality information, e.g. uncertainty, lineage and provenance, and complete and contemporaneous metadata/documentation is key for the trustworthiness of Earth science data. Researchers and public users need to efficiently find, access, and evaluate the quality level of Earth science data against their needs. Papers in this session cover topics on quality and trustworthiness of Earth science data, including: best practices for improving the capturing, describing, availability, and usage of Earth science data quality; assessment, characterization, and expression of data uncertainty, accuracy and precision; quality indicators for users to intuitively judge data quality; applications that manage and leverage quality information to improve user experience on data discovery and assist users to evaluate the fitness-for-use of Earth science data.
Primary Convener:  Yaxing Wei, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States
Conveners:  Steven J Worley, National Center for Atmospheric Research, CISL/DSS, Boulder, CO, United States and Ge Peng, NC State University and NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites, North Carolina (CICS-NC), Asheville, NC, United States
Chairs:  Yaxing Wei, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States, Steven J Worley, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, United States and Ge Peng, NC State University and NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites, North Carolina (CICS-NC), Asheville, NC, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Yaxing Wei, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, United States
Co-Organized with:
Earth and Space Science Informatics, Atmospheric Sciences, Biogeosciences, Global Environmental Change, and Ocean Sciences

Cross-Listed:
  • A - Atmospheric Sciences
  • B - Biogeosciences
  • GC - Global Environmental Change
  • OS - Ocean Sciences
Index Terms:

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Christopher J Merchant, University of Reading, Department of Meteorology, Reading, United Kingdom
Yanan Xin, Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, University Park, PA, United States and Guido Cervone, Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, Department of Geography and Institute for Computational and Data Sciences, University Park, PA, United States
Zhong Liu, George Mason University Fairfax, Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems (CSISS), Fairfax, VA, United States; NASA GSFC GES DISC (CSISS, George Mason University), Greenbelt, United States, Chung-Lin Shie, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, GES DISC, Code 610.2, Greenbelt, MD, United States and David J Meyer, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, GES DISC, Greenbelt, United States
Gillian Sharer1, Laura Keyson2, Mary E. Templeton2, Bruce Weertman3, Kyle Smith4, Justin R Sweet5, Carl Tape6, Robert E Casey2 and Tim Ahern2, (1)IRIS, Data Management Center, Seattle, United States, (2)IRIS, Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, United States, (3)IRIS Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, United States, (4)Academia Sinica, Institute of Earth Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, (5)IRIS, Socorro, United States, (6)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, United States
Ethan James Heck1, Braden Owsley2, Geoffrey M Henebry3 and Kirsten de Beurs2, (1)University of Oklahoma Norman Campus, Geography and Environmental Sustainability, Norman, OK, United States, (2)University of Oklahoma, Geography and Environmental Sustainability, Norman, OK, United States, (3)Michigan State University, Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences & Center for Global Change and Earth Observations, East Lansing, United States
Thomas Hearty1, Bruce Vollmer2, Jennifer C Wei3, Paul M. Huwe4, Arif Albayrak5, Dong Liang Wu6, Dave L. Meyer1, Richard I Cullather7, Jae N. Lee8, John M Blaisdell6, Joel Susskind9 and Sophie Nowicki10, (1)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, GES DISC, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (2)NASA GSFC, GES DISC, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (3)NASA GSFC, GES DISC, Greenbelt, United States, (4)ADNET Systems Inc., Greenbelt, MD, United States, (5)ADNET Systems Inc. Greenbelt, Greenbelt, United States, (6)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, United States, (7)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, United States, (8)UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY, Greenbelt, United States, (9)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (10)NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, United States
Sarah M Champion, North Carolina State University, Cooperative Institute for Satellite Earth System Studies, Leicester, NC, United States and Kenneth Kunkel, CICS-NC/NCDC, Asheville, NC, United States
Weiguo Han and Matthew Jochum, NOAA College Park, College Park, MD, United States