A43F:
Leveraging Inventories, Observations, and Models to Improve the Scientific Basis of Emissions III Posters

Submit an Abstract to this Session



Session ID#: 26800

Session Description:
Accurate, up-to-date inventories that comprehensively represent emissions sources at the process level are critical tools for understanding atmospheric composition and for designing effective environmental regulation. Emissions estimates derived from atmospheric in-situ and remote-sensing observations and chemical-transport models can help to identify information gaps and increase confidence in inventories. This session invites research aimed at improving the scientific understanding of emissions through inventory development, ambient observations, and atmospheric modeling. We welcome studies of emissions from anthropogenic and/or natural sources at a variety of spatial and temporal scales relevant to air quality and/or climate.
Primary Convener:  Gregory J Frost, NOAA ESRL, Boulder, CO, United States
Conveners:  Barron H Henderson, EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States and Barry L Lefer, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC, United States
Chairs:  Barron H Henderson, EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States and Barry L Lefer, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Gregory J Frost, NOAA Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States

Cross-Listed:
  • B - Biogeosciences
  • GC - Global Environmental Change
Index Terms:

0322 Constituent sources and sinks [ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE]
0345 Pollution: urban and regional [ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE]
0365 Troposphere: composition and chemistry [ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE]
0478 Pollution: urban, regional and global [BIOGEOSCIENCES]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Discrepancies and Uncertainties in Bottom-up Gridded Inventories of Livestock Methane Emissions for the Contiguous United States (221768)
Cynthia Randles1, Alexander N. Hristov2, Michael Harper3, Robert Meinen4, Rick Day5, Juliana Lopes4, Troy Ott4 and Aranya Venkatesh1, (1)ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company, Annandale, NJ, United States, (2)Pennsylvania State University, Animal Science, University Park, PA, United States, (3)The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Animal Science, University Park, PA, United States, (4)The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Animal Science, University Park, PA, United States, (5)The Pennsylvania State University, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, University Park, PA, United States
Estimating Biases for Regional Methane Fluxes using Co-emitted Tracers (294544)
Ray Bambha1, Cosmin Safta2, Hope A Michelsen3, Xinguang Cui4, Seongeun Jeong4 and Marc Laurenz Fischer4, (1)Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, United States, (2)Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, United States, (3)Sandia National Lab, Livermore, CA, United States, (4)Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, Berkeley, CA, United States
Inversion Estimate of California Methane Emissions Using a Bayesian Inverse Model with Multi-Tower Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Network and Aircraft Measurements (295887)
Yuyan Cui1, Matthias Falk2, Yanju Chen1, Jorn Herner1, Bart Eric Croes1 and Abhilash Vijayan1, (1)California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, United States, (2)California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board, Sacramento, United States
Integrating internet GPS vehicle tracking data into a bottom-up vehicular emissions inventory and atmospheric simulation in South-East, Brazil (274132)
Sergio Ibarra Espinosa, NOAA, Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, United States, Rita Ynoue, University of Sao Paulo, Institute of Astronomy, Geophysics and Atmospheric Sciences, Sao Paulo, Brazil and Mariana Giannotti Dr., Laboratory of Geoprocessing, Escola Politécnica (Poli) Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Update of NOx emission temporal profiles using CMAQ-HDDM (267453)
Changhan Bae, Ajou University, Environmental and Safety Engineering, Suwon, Korea, Republic of (South), Jae-Bum Lee, National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), Air Quality Forecasting Center, Climate and Air Quality Research Department, Incheon, South Korea, Hyun C Kim, Cooperative Institute for Satellite Earth System Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, United States, Byeong-Uk Kim, Georgia Environmental Protection Division, Atlanta, GA, United States and Soontae Kim, Ajou University, Environmental and Safety Engineering, Suwon, South Korea
Technical discussions on Emissions and Atmospheric Modeling (TEAM) (254314)
Gregory J Frost, NOAA Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, Barron H Henderson, EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States and Barry L Lefer, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC, United States
On-line Field Measurements of Speciated PM1 Emission Factors from Common South Asian Combustion Sources (298105)
James Douglas Goetz1, Michael R Giordano2, Chelsea E. Stockwell3, Rashmi Maharjan4, Sagar Adhikari5, Prakash Bhave5, Puppala S Praveen5, Arnico K Panday5, Thilina Jayarathne6, Elizabeth A. Stone7, Robert J Yokelson8 and Peter F DeCarlo9, (1)Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)Drexel University, Department of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering, Philadelphia, PA, United States, (3)Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, United States, (4)Clean Energy Nepal, Lalitpur, Nepal, (5)International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal, (6)Purdue University, Department of Chemistry, West Lafayette, IN, United States, (7)University of Iowa, Chemistry, Iowa City, United States, (8)University of Montana, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Missoula, United States, (9)Johns Hopkins University, Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Baltimore, MD, United States
Rapid increase in Chloroform (CHCl3) emissions in China (258814)
Xuekun Fang1, Sunyoung Park2, Takuya Saito3, Ronald G Prinn4, Matthew L Rigby5, Shanlan Li6, Anita Ganesan7, Yoko Yokouchi8, Mark F Lunt5 and Alicia Gressent1, (1)Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Global Change Science, Cambridge, MA, United States, (2)Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea, (3)National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, (4)Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Sustainability Science and Strategy, Cambridge, United States, (5)University of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Bristol, United Kingdom, (6)Kyungpook National University, Sangju, South Korea, (7)University of Bristol, School of Geographical Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom, (8)NIES National Institute of Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, Japan
Development and evaluation of high-resolution regional emission inventory: A case study for Jiangsu Province, China (264098)
Yu Zhao1, Pan Mao2 and Yaduan Zhou2, (1)Nanjing University, School of the Environment, Nanjing, China, (2)Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Emission Inventory Development and Application Based On an Atmospheric Emission Source Priority Control Classification Technology Method, a Case Study in the Middle Reaches of Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China (269639)
Xiaowei Sun and Shuiyuan Cheng, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China
Atmospheric toxic metals emission inventory and spatial characteristics from anthropogenic sources of Guangdong province, China (254512)
Sha Cher1, Lu Menghua2, Xiao Xiao2, Wu Yuqi2, Zhong Zhuangmin2, Huang Zhijiong3, Li Cheng2, Guanglin Jia1, Yuan Zibing2 and Zheng Junyu2, (1)South China University of Technology, School of Energy and Environment, Guangzhou, China, (2)South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China, (3)Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
Evaluating the UK’s carbon budget using a dense network of tall-tower observations (250942)
Emily White1, Matthew L Rigby2, Alistair Manning3, Mark F Lunt2, Anita Ganesan4, Simon O'Doherty2, Ann Stavert2, Kieran M Stanley2, Mathew Williams5, Thomas Luke Smallman5, Edward Comyn-Platt6 and Peter E. Levy7, (1)University of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Bristol, BS8, United Kingdom, (2)University of Bristol, School of Chemistry, Bristol, United Kingdom, (3)UK Meteorological Office, Exeter, United Kingdom, (4)University of Bristol, School of Geographical Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom, (5)University of Edinburgh, School of GeoSciences, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, (6)Center for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, United Kingdom, (7)Center for Ecology and Hydrology Penicuik, Penicuik, United Kingdom
Comparative Evaluation of Five Fire Emissions Datasets Using the GEOS-5 Model (240855)
Charles M Ichoku1, Xiaohua Pan2, Mian Chin1, Huisheng Bian3, Anton Darmenov4, Luke Ellison4, Tom L Kucsera1, Arlindo da SIlva1, Mariya M Petrenko1, Jun Wang5, Cui Ge6 and Christine Wiedinmyer7, (1)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (2)NASA GSFC/GES DISC, Greenbelt, United States, (3)Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, Baltimore, MD, United States, (4)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, United States, (5)University of Iowa, Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Iowa City, IA, United States, (6)University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, United States, (7)CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States
A high-resolution open biomass burning emission inventory based on statistical data and MODIS observations in mainland China (265936)
Yuanqian Xu1, Meng Fan2, Zhijiong Huang3, Junyu Zheng1,4 and Liangfu Chen5, (1)South China University of Technology, School of Energy and Environment, Guangzhou, China, (2)Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijng, China, (3)Jinan University, Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Guangzhou, China, (4)The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China, (5)CAS Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijng, China
Leaf enclosure measurement for determining marijuana volatile organic compound emission factors (278284)
Chi-Tsan Wang1, William Vizuete1, Christine Wiedinmyer2, Kirsti Ashworth3, Peter C Harley4 and John Victor Ortega5, (1)University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States, (2)CIRES, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States, (3)Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research-Atmospheric Environmental Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, (4)Denver, Boulder, CO, United States, (5)National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, United States

See more of: Atmospheric Sciences