NS11A:
Hydrogeophysical Methods for Groundwater Evaluation, Management, and Modeling

Submit an Abstract to this Session



Session ID#: 30521

Session Description:
Effective, sustainable management of groundwater resources requires accurate knowledge of aquifer characteristics and hydrologic processes including recharge, groundwater surface-water interaction and the impacts of pumping. In this session we focus on the application of hydrogeophysical methods including borehole, surface, airborne, and(or) remote sensing techniques to characterize aquifer boundaries and hydrostratigraphy and quantify hydrologic properties and processes in support of groundwater modeling. Of interest are examples related to all aspects of groundwater characterization and management including, but not limited to, development of hydrostratigraphic models, assessment of aquifer properties, evaluation of groundwater quantity and quality, and monitoring of natural/managed processes.
Primary Convener:  John W Lane Jr, USGS Hydrogeophysics Branch, Storrs, CT, United States
Convener:  Esben Auken, Aarhus University, Department of Geoscience, Aarhus C, Denmark
Chairs:  Esben Auken, Aarhus University, Department of Geoscience, Aarhus C, Denmark and John W Lane Jr, USGS Hydrogeophysics Branch, Storrs, CT, United States
OSPA Liaison:  John W Lane Jr, USGS Hydrogeophysics Branch, Storrs, CT, United States

Cross-Listed:
  • H - Hydrology
Index Terms:

0933 Remote sensing [EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS]
1835 Hydrogeophysics [HYDROLOGY]
1847 Modeling [HYDROLOGY]
1880 Water management [HYDROLOGY]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Jeff Kennedy, USGS Arizona Water Science Center, Tucson, AZ, United States and Jamie P Macy, USGS Arizona Water Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
Shinjiro Yano1, Hiroto Kondo1, Yasuhiro Tawara2, Takeshi Yamada3, Koji Mori4, Akifumi Yoshida2, Kazuhiro Tada2, Maki Tsujimura5 and Tomochika Tokunaga6, (1)Suntory Global Innovation Center Limited, Kyoto, Japan, (2)Geosphere Environmental Technology Corporation, Tokyo, Japan, (3)Suntory Holdings Limited, Tokyo, Japan, (4)Blue Earth Security Co.,Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, (5)University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan, (6)The University of Tokyo, Department of Environment Systems, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, Kashiwa, Japan
Damu Pandey1, Umesh Chandra Bhusal2, Hari Ghimire1, Bhaskar Khatiwada2, Rajendra Prasad Bhandari3, Shiva Amatya4 and Mohamed ABDUL KADAR Prabhu5, (1)Explorer Geophysical Consultants Pvt Ltd, Geophysics, Kathmandu, Nepal, (2)Tribhuvan University, Central Department of Geology, Kathmandu, Nepal, (3)Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal, (4)Lekhanath Small Town Water Supply and Sanitation User Committee, Pokhara, Nepal, (5)ST Geomative Co. Ltd China, Shenzhen, China
Emily L Maher1, Kelley A Shaw1, Christie Carey1, Michelle Elyse Scalise2, Spencer K. Whitman1, Jade Bourdeau1, Eric Eckert1, John N Louie3 and Greg M Stock4, (1)University of Nevada Reno, Reno, NV, United States, (2)University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, United States, (3)Nevada Seismological Lab, Reno, NV, United States, (4)Yosemite National Park, El Portal, CA, United States
Hannah Abila1, Harold Gurrola2, Andres Fernandez1, Thomas Luke Taylor3, Ivan Gonzalez1, Zachary W Duron1, Juan Garza1 and Juan Ortega1, (1)Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States, (2)Texas Tech University, Geosciences, Lubbock, TX, United States, (3)Colorado State University, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Fort Collins, CO, United States