G54A:
Advances in Gravity Sensors and Measurements: New Challenges and Opportunities II

Submit an Abstract to this Session



Session ID#: 30656

Session Description:
Steady advances in the collection, processing, and modeling of gravity have increased its popularity and usefulness for improving geoidal and geophysical models. Recent developments in gravity sensors, including laser-cooled atom gravimeters, have resulted in new few µGal instruments and have the potential for future sub-µGal sensors.  This session will bring together users and providers of gravimetric sensors to explore the currently unmet needs of today's gravimeter community and to identify research areas that could benefit from this greater accuracy and stability.  For this session, we welcome abstracts that discuss gravity in terms of its collection and/or processing and/or applications to geophysical and geoid modeling including science questions associated with tides, earthquakes, groundwater flow, geoid modeling, and other such topics.  Finally, presenters without access to proprietary data sets are encouraged to use publicly available data (e.g., NGS GRAV-D, etc.) and to submit an abstract based on their investigation of this data.
Primary Convener:  Thomas J Johnson, NGA, Research, Burke, VA, United States
Convener:  Vicki A Childers, NOAA, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
Chairs:  Thomas J Johnson, NGA, Research, Burke, VA, United States and Vicki A Childers, NOAA, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Thomas J Johnson, NGA, Research, Burke, VA, United States

Cross-Listed:
  • C - Cryosphere
  • H - Hydrology
  • NS - Near Surface Geophysics

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Daniel E Barnes, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, Springfield, VA, United States, Simon A Holmes, NOAA, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States, Sarah Ingalls, NGA, Arnold, MO, United States, James Beale, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, St. Louis, United States, Manny R Presicci, NGA, St Louis, MO, United States and Cliff Minter, National Geospatial Intelligence Agency, St. Louis, MO, United States
Monica Youngman, NOAA National Weather Service, Office of Science and Technology Integration, Asheville, United States, Jeffery Allen Johnson, Data Solutions & Technology, Silver Spring, United States, Derek van Westrum, NOAA National Geodetic Survey, Boulder, United States and Theresa Damiani, NOAA, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
Felipe Guzman, University of Arizona, Wyant College of Optical Sciences, Tucson, United States
William T Pike1, Anisha Mukherjee2, Tristram Warren3, Constantinos Charalambous2, Simon B Calcutt3 and Ian Standley4, (1)Imperial College London, London, SW7, United Kingdom, (2)Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, (3)University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, (4)StandleyTech, Claremont, CA, United States
Bruno Desruelle1, Pierre Vermeulen2, Vincent Menoret2, Arnaud Landragin3, Philippe Bouyer4, Nicolas Le Moigne5, Germinal Gabalda6 and Sylvain Bonvalot7, (1)Muquans, Pessac, France, (2)Muquans, Talence, France, (3)LNE-SYRTE, Observatoire de Paris-Université PSL, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France, (4)CNRS, Paris Cedex 16, France, (5)Laboratoire Geosciences, UMR 5243, Montpellier, France, (6)GET (CNRS, IRD, UPS, CNES) - University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France, (7)IRD Bondy, Bondy Cedex, France
Jeanne M Giniaux1, Andrew J Hooper2 and Marco Bagnardi2, (1)University of Leeds, COMET, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, LS2, United Kingdom, (2)University of Leeds, COMET, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, United Kingdom
Peter C Chu, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, United States

See more of: Geodesy