B54A:
Concentration-Discharge Relations in the Critical Zone II

Submit an Abstract to this Session



Session ID#: 31856

Session Description:
Process-level prediction of critical zone (CZ) structure and long-term evolution depends on an improved understanding of how hydrologic flows and biogeochemical reactions are coupled on the incremental time scale of hydrologic events. Hydro-bio-geochemical couplings can be inferred from solute releases measured down-gradient of reactive flow paths. These flow paths have variable lengths, compositions, and residence times, and their mixing is reflected in concentration-discharge (C-Q) relations. We invite contributions that seek to resolve mechanisms operating within the CZ (from canopy to bedrock) that control down-gradient C-Q behavior. Focus of the session spans the full range of rock-derived and bio-active solutes, including dissolved, gaseous and colloidal species that may co-occur for a given element. Papers that incorporate observations of internal catchment function (e.g., dynamic relations among hydrology and (bio)geochemistry in various CZ locations) to interpret controls over integrated C/Q response are especially encouraged.
Primary Convener:  Jon Chorover, University of Arizona, Department of Environmental Science, Tucson, United States
Conveners:  Jerome Gaillardet, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France, William H McDowell, University of New Hampshire Main Campus, Natural Resources and the Environment, Durham, NH, United States and Jennifer L Druhan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
Chairs:  Jon Chorover, University of Arizona, Department of Environmental Science, Tucson, United States and Jennifer L Druhan, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Jon Chorover, University of Arizona, Department of Environmental Science, Tucson, United States

Cross-Listed:
  • H - Hydrology
Index Terms:

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Mr. Julien Bouchez, PhD1, Jean-Sebastien Moquet1, Jhan Carlo Espinoza2, Jean_Michel Martinez3, Jean-Loup Guyot Sr.4 and Naziano Filizola5, (1)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France, (2)Instituto Geofísico del Perú, Lima, Peru, (3)Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), CNRS, UPS, CNES, Laboratoire GET, Toulouse, France, (4)Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement Lima, GET, Lima, Peru, (5)Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil
Elizabeth Herndon, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge, United States, Grit Steinhoefel, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz-Center for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany, Ashlee Laura Denton Dere, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Geography/Geology, Omaha, NE, United States and Pamela L Sullivan, Oregon State University, College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Corvallis, OR, United States
Sarah Godsey, Idaho State University, Geosciences, Idaho Falls, ID, United States and James W Kirchner, ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Department of Environmental Systems Science, Zurich, Switzerland
Matthew Winnick, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States and Katharine Maher, Stanford University, Earth System Science, Stanford, CA, United States
Douglas A Burns1, Gregory Brad Lawrence2, Charles T Driscoll3, Timothy J Sullivan4, Shuai Shao5 and Todd C McDonnell4, (1)US Geological Survey, New York Water Science Center Troy, Troy, United States, (2)US Geological Survey, Troy, NY, United States, (3)Syracuse University, Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Syracuse, NY, United States, (4)E&S Environmental Chemistry, Corvallis, OR, United States, (5)Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, United States
Arnulfo Andrés Aguirre, Cornell University, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Ithaca, NY, United States and Louis A Derry, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France

See more of: Biogeosciences