B23G:
Remote Sensing in Terrestrial Ecosystems: Cross-Scale Approaches to Understanding Structure, Function, and Process II

Submit an Abstract to this Session



Session ID#: 31927

Session Description:
Advances in remote sensing technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to understand ecosystem structure and function at spatial and temporal scales never before possible. New sensors, increased data availability, and emerging technologies facilitate novel, cross-disciplinary approaches to advance our understanding of terrestrial systems. Near Earth and Satellite derived data products have allowed researchers to link trends in vegetative traits, such as foliar chemistry and net primary productivity, to key ecosystem processes such as decomposition, nutrient cycling, and biodiversity. Combined approaches, integrating remote sensing data products with in situ and experimental measurements, can help improve the monitoring and management of ecosystem changes over time and increase the accuracy of ecosystem models. How do we use remote sensing data to scale up ground measurements? What are key opportunities to inform understanding of ecosystem dynamics and biogeochemical cycles? We invite submissions from researchers using remote sensing technologies to study ecosystem structure, function, and processes.
Primary Convener:  Martha Farella, Stantec Consulting Ltd, Phoenix, United States
Conveners:  Mallory Barnes, University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, Tucson, AZ, United States and David JP Moore, University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, Tucson, AZ, United States
Chairs:  David JP Moore1, Mallory Barnes1 and Martha Farella2, (1)University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, Tucson, AZ, United States(2)Stantec Consulting Ltd, Phoenix, United States
OSPA Liaison:  David JP Moore, University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, Tucson, AZ, United States

Cross-Listed:
  • GC - Global Environmental Change
Index Terms:

0439 Ecosystems, structure and dynamics [BIOGEOSCIENCES]
0480 Remote sensing [BIOGEOSCIENCES]
1622 Earth system modeling [GLOBAL CHANGE]
1640 Remote sensing [GLOBAL CHANGE]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Yao Zhang, University of Oklahoma Norman Campus, Norman, OK, United States, Xiangming Xiao, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States, Xiaocui Wu, University of Oklahoma, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, Norman, OK, United States, Sha Zhou, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, Beijing, CHINA, Geli Zhang, China Agricultural University, College of Land Science and Technology, Beijing, China, Yuanwei Qin, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, Center for Earth Observation and Modeling, University of Oklahoma, Norman, United States and Jinwei Dong, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Kirsten Lees1, Myroslava Khomik2, Joanna M Clark3, Tristan L Quaife4 and Rebekka Artz2, (1)University of Reading, Reading, RG6, United Kingdom, (2)The James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, (3)University of Reading, Department of Geography and Environmental Science, Reading, United Kingdom, (4)University of Reading, Department of Meteorology, Reading, RG6, United Kingdom
John F Knowles, University of Colorado at Boulder, INSTAAR, Boulder, CO, United States, Noah P Molotch, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, Ernesto Trujillo, EPFL Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland and Marcy E Litvak, University of New Mexico, Department of Biology, Albuquerque, United States
Anna K Schweiger, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Dept. of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, Saint Paul, MN, United States, Jeannine Cavender-Bares, University of Minnesota, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, Saint Paul, MN, United States, Michael D Madritch, Appalachian State University, Dept. of Biology, Boone, NC, United States, John Arthur Gamon, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, United States, Sarah E Hobbie, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, St. Paul, MN, United States, Rebecca Montgomery, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Dept. of Forest Resources, Saint Paul, United States and Philip A Townsend, University of Wisconsin Madison, Forest and Wildlife Ecology, Madison, WI, United States
Jeannine Cavender-Bares, University of Minnesota, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, Saint Paul, MN, United States, Anna K Schweiger, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Dept. of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, Saint Paul, MN, United States, Sarah E Hobbie, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, St. Paul, MN, United States, Michael D Madritch, Appalachian State University, Dept. of Biology, Boone, NC, United States, Zhihui Wang, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States, John J Couture, Purdue University, West Lafayette, United States, John Arthur Gamon, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, United States and Philip A Townsend, University of Wisconsin Madison, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, Madison, United States
Karl F Huemmrich, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, United States, Petya K. E. Campbell, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, United States, Bo-Cai Gao, Naval Research Lab DC, Washington, DC, United States, Lawrence B Flanagan, Univ Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada and Michael Goulden, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States
Ying Sun1, Christian Frankenberg2, Jeffrey D Wood3, David Schimel4, Martin Jung5, Luis Guanter6, Darren Drewry7, Manish Verma8, Albert Porcar-Castell9, Timothy J Griffis10, Lianhong Gu11, Troy Magney12, Philipp Koehler13, Bradley John Evans14 and Karen Yuen12, (1)Cornell University, School of Integrative Plant Science, Ithaca, NY, United States, (2)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)University of Missouri, School of Natural Resources, Columbia, United States, (4)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (5)Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Department of Biogeochemical Integration, Jena, Germany, (6)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (7)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (8)University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, United States, (9)University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, (10)University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Department of Soil, Water, and Climate, St. Paul, United States, (11)Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge, TN, United States, (12)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (13)EUMETSAT, Darmstadt, Germany, (14)University of Sydney, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

See more of: Biogeosciences