GC41I:
How Can Global Change Research Inform National Security Decision-Making? Posters


Submit an Abstract to this Session


Session ID#: 53085

Session Description:
Increasing attention is being paid to the potential risks that global change poses to national security. These risks may be direct- for example, through impacts on national security assets- or indirect- through geopolitical impacts resulting from changes in food, water, and energy availability; changes in economic growth and development; increased risks to human health; and changes in strategic environments. Global change research can inform national security decision-making by advancing understanding and prediction of global change. Progress is constrained, however, by the undersampling of the environment, gaps in our understanding of key processes, and limitations in modeling of natural and human systems. This session welcomes abstracts showcasing substantive contributions research makes to national security issues, as well as current outstanding science needs. Potential topics include development of observations, process studies, and Earth system prediction capabilities, as well as research in important thematic areas, such as human health or the food-energy-water nexus.
Primary Convener:  Apurva Dave, US Global Change Research Program, Washington DC, United States
Convener:  David Blauvelt, National Intelligence University, Bethesda, MD, United States
Primary Liaison:  Apurva Dave, US Global Change Research Program, Washington DC, United States
Chairs:  Apurva Dave, US Global Change Research Program, Washington DC, United States and David Blauvelt, National Intelligence University, Bethesda, MD, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Apurva Dave, US Global Change Research Program, Washington DC, United States

Cross-Listed:
  • A - Atmospheric Sciences
  • GH - GeoHealth
  • OS - Ocean Sciences
  • SI - Societal Impacts and Policy Sciences

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Kimberley Rain Miner1,2, Heather Ward2 and Robin Rogers3, (1)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (2)USACE-ERDC GRL, Geospatial Research Lab, Alexandria, VA, United States, (3)USACE ERDC GRL, Geospatial Research Lab, Alexandria, VA, United States
Nathan Kettle1, Lawson W Brigham1, Hajo Eicken2, Andrew R Mahoney3, Joshua Jones4 and Dina Abdel-Fattah1, (1)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (2)University of Alaska Fairbanks, International Arctic Research Center, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (3)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, United States, (4)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, AK, United States
Alec Bennett1, Hajo Eicken2, Jasper O. Hardesty3, Lori Kay Parrott4, Mark Ivey5, Vladimir A Alexeev6, Nancy L. Fresco2 and John C Eichelberger7, (1)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (2)University of Alaska Fairbanks, International Arctic Research Center, Fairbanks, AK, United States, (3)Corvallis, OR, United States, (4)Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, United States, (5)Sandia National Labs, Albuquerque, NM, United States, (6)Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, United States, (7)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska Center for Energy and Power, Fairbanks, United States
Bruce Franklin Molnia, U.S. Geological Survey, National Civil Applications Center, Reston, United States, Kim Angeli, US Geological Survey, National Civil Applications Center, Reston, VA, United States and Shawn Dilles, U.S. Geological Survey, National Civil Applications Center, Reston, VA, United States