C43A:
Beyond Ice Thickness: Using Radar Sounding to Understand the Dynamics of Glacier Systems I


Submit an Abstract to this Session


Session ID#: 60704

Session Description:
Few methods allow the direct observation of thermal, hydrological, and geological processes acting below the surface of glaciers and ice sheets. Radar sounding provides a powerful geophysical technique for understanding these processes. Research efforts are underway to develop and apply techniques that leverage the geometric and radiometric information in radar sounding data to constrain properties of the ice column and bed. The growing archive of sounding data provides spatial and temporal information not only about bed topography, but also ice temperature, englacial and basal hydrology, and ice flow dynamics. This session explores the application of radar sounder data to questions of ice dynamics, and we invite abstracts reporting all aspects of radar development, data analysis, and model-data integration.
Primary Convener:  Nicholas Holschuh, University of Washington, Earth and Space Sciences, Seattle, United States
Conveners:  Dustin M Schroeder, Stanford University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, United States, Winnie Chu, Stanford University, Geophysics, Stanford, CA, United States and Jonathan Kingslake, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY, United States
Primary Liaisons:  Dustin M Schroeder, Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, United States and Nicholas Holschuh, University of Washington, Earth and Space Sciences, Seattle, United States
Chairs:  Dustin M Schroeder, Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, United States, Winnie Chu, Georgia Institute of Technology Main Campus, Atlanta, United States and Jonathan Kingslake, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Jonathan Kingslake, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY, United States
Index Terms:

0768 Thermal regime [CRYOSPHERE]
0770 Properties [CRYOSPHERE]
0776 Glaciology [CRYOSPHERE]
0794 Instruments and techniques [CRYOSPHERE]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Reinhard Drews1, Clemens Schannwell2, Todd Alan Ehlers1, Carlos Martin3, Frank Pattyn4, Tore Hattermann5 and Rupert Michael Gladstone6, (1)University of Tübingen, Department of Geosciences, Tübingen, Germany, (2)University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, (3)NERC British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United Kingdom, (4)Université Libre de Bruxelles, Laboratoire de Glaciologie, Brussels, Belgium, (5)Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz-Center for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven, Bremerhaven, Germany, (6)University of Lapland, Arctic Centre, Rovaniemi, Finland
Elizabeth Case and Jonathan Kingslake, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY, United States
Lynn M Kaluzienski1, Peter Ortquist Koons1, Ellyn M Enderlin2, Steven Arcone, Seth W Campbell4, Zoe Courville5 and Clara Beatrix Deck6, (1)University of Maine, School of Earth and Climate Sciences, Orono, ME, United States, (2)Boise State University, Department of Geosciences, Boise, ID, United States, (3)University of Maine, Earth and Climate Sciences and Climate Change Institute, Orono, United States, (4)Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH, United States, (5)College of Wooster, Wooster, OH, United States
Irena Vankova1, Denis Voytenko2, Keith W Nicholls3, Surui Xie4, Byron R Parizek5 and David Holland1, (1)New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York, United States, (2)University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States, (3)British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, United Kingdom, (4)University of Houston, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Houston, TX, United States, (5)Pennsylvania State University, Department of Geosciences and Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, University Park, United States
Shinan Lang1, Xiangbin Cui2, Xiaojun Liu3, Qiang Wu1 and Wenbo Zhang4, (1)Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China, (2)Polar Research Institute of China, Shanghai, China, (3)Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, (4)Beijing university of technology, Beijing, China
Davide Castelletti1, Dustin M Schroeder1 and Elisa Mantelli2, (1)Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, United States, (2)Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
John Drysdale Paden1, Victor Berger2, Mohanad Al-Ibadi2, Shane Chu2, Mingze Xu3, David Crandall3 and Geoffrey Fox4, (1)Center for Remote Sensing of Ice Sheets (CReSIS), University of Kansas, Lawrence, United States, (2)University of Kansas, Lawrence, United States, (3)Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States, (4)University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
Thomas Jordan1,2, Dustin M Schroeder3, Davide Castelletti4, Jilu Li5, Jonathan L Bamber2 and Jørgen Dall6, (1)Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, CA, United States, (2)University of Bristol, School of Geographical Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom, (3)Stanford University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford, United States, (4)Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, United States, (5)University of Kansas, Center of Remote Sensing and Integrated Systems (CReSIS), Lawrence, United States, (6)DTU Space, Lyngby, Denmark

See more of: Cryosphere