Comparing permeability of fault zones of geothermal and non-geothermal regions, compiled in a global fault zone permeability database.
Previously Published Material: An update of this project was presented at the AGU 2014 by Scibek et al in abstract titled "How fault zones impact regional permeability and groundwater systems: insights from global database of fault zone studies."
Abstract ID#: 36561
The data from developed geothermal projects are compared to other fault permeability estimates at thermal springs (analytical and numerical solution of Darcy flux driven by convective heat flow). Starting with the methodology applied in Japan by Hanano and Kajiwara (1999) and regional mapping by Muraoka et al. (2006), a similar methodology is applied to other regions where hot thermal springs occur. 2D numerical flow models of heat+water flow are used to explore the assumptions and parameter sensitivities of these methods. Fault permeability data from sedimentary basins are compared globally with geothermal heat flux, depth, reservoir size and scale of measurement, number of wells drilled, and other parameters. These results are also compared to non-geothermal hydrogeological data of fault zone permeability in these regions.
The research result lead to a key question - are fault permeability data from developed geothermal fields transferable and/or scalable, or useful in any way, to exploration in geothermally undeveloped sedimentary basins?
