Comparing the Bioavailability of a Natural and Synthetic Iron Source: Do Past Experiments Accurately Model Diatom Growth in Response to Episodic Iron Addition?
Comparing the Bioavailability of a Natural and Synthetic Iron Source: Do Past Experiments Accurately Model Diatom Growth in Response to Episodic Iron Addition?
Abstract:
Episodic iron input plays an important role in dictating phytoplankton growth, physiology, and community structure in high-nitrate low-chlorophyll (HNLC) waters of the Gulf of Alaska. Experiments using FeCl3 as an iron source have resulted in diatom blooms with significant implications for ecosystem productivity and resilience. However, if FeCl3 and natural sources of iron differ in bioavailability, re-interpretation of these results is warranted. To test the hypothesis that iron is differentially bioavailable across natural and synthetic sources, in summer 2019 we performed a deck-board incubation exposing HNLC phytoplankton from the Northern Gulf of Alaska to dissolved iron from three sources: FeCl3, the Copper River plume, and HNLC waters. Over a five-day incubation, differences in phytoplankton growth, physiology, and community composition were observed across treatments. Cells > 20 µm exposed to FeCl3 had higher net growth rates (0.025 µg chl L-1 day-1) than cells exposed to iron from the Copper River plume (0.014 µg chl L-1 day-1) or HNLC waters (0.008 µg chl L-1 day-1). Trends identical to those for cells >20 µm were observed for cells 5- 20 µm and < 5 µm, though net growth rates were slightly lower for these size fractions compared to the > 20 µm size fraction. Photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm) ranged from 0.31- 0.49 for cells <5 µm and from 0.25- 0.61 for cells >20 µm across the three treatments. Fv/Fm was greatest for phytoplankton exposed to FeCl3 and trends in Fv/Fm highlight community dynamics within incubation bottles. We also present results on diatom community composition and nano-phytoplankton abundance and physiology (e.g. pigment production). We conclude that FeCl3 is more bioavailable to diatoms than natural sources of iron and highlight the need to compare bioavailability of natural iron sources to more accurately understand phytoplankton productivity in HNLC waters.