As oceanographic sensor and platform technologies evolve, observational capabilities are expanding at an exhilarating pace. From arduinos to robots, emerging technologies give scientists new tools to explore the world oceans. But only if they know these technologies exist!
Enter the eLightning sessions, a 3-minute oral presentation with a digital poster session. The format provides scientists a snapshot of all the latest technologies and will facilitate more interactions between builders and users. We encourage submissions from anyone making new tools to observe the ocean: scientists to manufacturers to garage tinkerers. Built a sensor the size of a pinhead? A platform that will go where no platform has gone before? An instrument borne of arduino with the power of the borg? Share what you’ve built with colleagues in this interactive session.
Primary Chair: Kim I Martini, Sea-Bird Scientific, Bellevue, WA, United States
Co-chairs: Sophie N Chu, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, Seattle, WA, United States, Clark Richards, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Halifax, NS, Canada and Kersey Sturdivant, INSPIRE Environmental, Newport, RI, United States
Primary Liaison: Kim I Martini, Tini Scientific, Seattle, United States
Moderators: Sophie N Chu, Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, Seattle, WA, United States and Kersey Sturdivant, INSPIRE Environmental, Newport, RI, United States
Student Paper Review Liaisons: Kim I Martini, Tini Scientific, Seattle, United States and Clark Richards, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Halifax, NS, Canada
SCUID - a Platform for In-Situ Dissolved Gas Measurement of N2O and NO (658266)
Anuscheh Nawaz1, Mark Andrew Barry2, Philip Colosimo3, Steve Kahle4, Jing Li5 and Craig McNeil1, (1)Applied Physics Laboratory University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States, (2)Pro-Oceanus, Bridgewater, NS, Canada, (3)Applied Physics Laboratory University of Washington, Ocean Engineering Department, Seattle, United States, (4)Applied Physics Laboratory University of Washington, Seattle, United States, (5)NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States
A New Lidar Capability to Map Littoral Zones (657729)
Andrew Gisler, ASTRALiTe Inc, Boulder, CO, United States, Cotton Nderson, ASTRALiTe Inc, Boulder, United States, Jeffrey P Thayer, University of Colorado Boulder, Ann and H.J. Smead Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, Boulder, United States and Gerald Thompson, ASTRA, LLC, Louisville, United States
Automating Coastal Citizen Science with a High-Tech Surfboard Fin: the Smartfin (648933)
Philip Joseph Bresnahan Jr1, Todd R Martz2, Tyler Cyronak2, Andreas J Andersson3, Robert J W Brewin4, Garrett Schmid5 and Andrew Stern6, (1)University of North Carolina Wilmington, Earth and Ocean Sciences, Wilmington, United States, (2)Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, United States, (3)Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, United States, (4)Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, United Kingdom, (5)California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, United States, (6)Maryland Heights, MO, United States
PlanktonScope : Affordable modular imaging platform for citizen oceanography (642507)
Thibaut Pollina1, Adam Larson1, Anton Molina1, Sebastien Colin2, Colomban de Vargas2,3, Hongquan Li1 and Manu Prakash4, (1)Stanford University, Bioengineering, Stanford, CA, United States, (2)Station Biologique de Roscoff, Sorbonne Université & CNRS, Roscoff, France, (3)Research Federation for the study of Global Ocean Systems Ecology and Evolution, FR2022/Tara GOSEE, Paris, France, (4)Stanford University, Bioengineering, Biology, Oceans, Stanford, United States
How a sailing drone became an oceanographic tool to explore the US Arctic (657493)
Heather M. Tabisola1, Calvin Mordy2, Dr. Jessica N Cross, PhD3, Christian Meinig4, Chidong Zhang3, Carey Kuhn5, Alex De Robertis6, Edward D Cokelet7, Noah Lawrence-Slavas3, Chelle L Gentemann8 and Richard Jenkins9, (1)Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Ocean, Seattle, WA, United States, (2)University of Washington, Cooperative Institute for Climate, Ocean, and Ecosystem Studies, Seattle, United States, (3)NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA, United States, (4)NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, United States, (5)NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Marine Mammal Laboratory, Seattle, WA, United States, (6)NOAA Fisheries, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Midwater Assessment and Conservation Engineering, Seattle, WA, United States, (7)Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA, United States, (8)Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa, United States, (9)Saildrone Inc., Alameda, United States
Low-cost technologies for coastal monitoring (654577)
Marco Marcelli1,2, Valentina Cafaro3, Alice Madonia4,5, Lorenzo Pasculli4, Viviana Piermattei4,6, Andrea Terribili3 and Riccardo Valentini7,8, (1)Laboratory of Experimental Oceanology and Marine Ecology University of Tuscia, DEB, Civitavecchia (RM), Italy, (2)Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, Lecce, Italy, (3)Consorzio Universitario per la Ricerca Socioeconomica e per l’Ambiente (CURSA), Roma, Italy, (4)Laboratory of Experimental Oceanology and Marine Ecology, University of Tuscia, Civitavecchia (RM), Italy, (5)CMCC - Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, Civitavecchia, Italy, (6)CMCC - Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change, Civitavecchia (RM), Italy, (7)University of Tuscia, Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest Systems (DIBAF), Viterbo, Italy, (8)Foundation Euro-Mediterranean Center on Climate Change (CMCC), Division on Climate Change Impacts on Agriculture, Forests and Ecosystem Services (IAFES), Viterbo, Italy
