C31A-0275:
Measuring Sea-Ice Motion in the Arctic with Real Time Photogrammetry

Wednesday, 17 December 2014
Rick A Hagen1, Mary F Peters1, Robert Liang1, David Ball2 and John M Brozena1, (1)Naval Research Lab, Washington, DC, United States, (2)ITT Exelis Inc. Herndon, Herndon, VA, United States
Abstract:
The U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, in coordination with other groups, has been collecting sea-ice data in the Arctic off the north coast of Alaska with an airborne system employing a radar altimeter, LiDAR and a photogrammetric camera in an effort to obtain wide swaths of measurements coincident with Cryosat-2 footprints. Because the satellite tracks traverse areas of moving pack ice, precise real-time estimates of the ice motion are needed to fly a survey grid that will yield complete data coverage. This requirement led us to develop a method to find the ice motion from the aircraft during the survey. With the advent of real-time orthographic photogrammetric systems, we developed a system that measures the sea ice motion in-flight, and also permits post-process modeling of sea ice velocities to correct the positioning of radar and LiDAR data.

For the 2013 and 2014 field seasons, we used this Real Time Ice Motion Estimation (RTIME) system to determine ice motion using Applanix’s Inflight Ortho software with an Applanix DSS439 system. Operationally, a series of photos were taken in the survey area. The aircraft then turned around and took more photos along the same line several minutes later. Orthophotos were generated within minutes of collection and evaluated by custom software to find photo footprints and potential overlap. Overlapping photos were passed to the correlation software, which selects a series of “chips” in the first photo and looks for the best matches in the second photo. The correlation results are then passed to a density-based clustering algorithm to determine the offset of the photo pair.

To investigate any systematic errors in the photogrammetry, we flew several flight lines over a fixed point on various headings, over an area of non-moving ice in 2013. The orthophotos were run through the correlation software to find any residual offsets, and run through additional software to measure chip positions and offsets relative to the aircraft heading. X- and Y-offsets in situations where one of the chips was near the center of its photo were plotted to find the along- and across-track errors vs. distance from the photo center. Corrections were determined and applied to the survey data, reducing the mean error by about 1 meter. The corrections were applied to all of the subsequent survey data.