Soil Greenhouse Gas Flux Measurements with Automated and Manual Static Chambers, Forced Diffusion Chamber, and Concentration Profiles

Tuesday, 16 December 2014
Leilei Ruan1, Patricia Y Oikawa1, Madeleine Géli2, Joseph G Verfaillie1, Cove S Sturtevant1, Sara H Knox1, Nick Nickerson3, Gordon McArthur3, Chance Creelman3, Nabil Saad4, Karrin P Alstad4, Caleb Arata4, Dennis D Baldocchi1 and Whendee L Silver1, (1)University of California Berkeley, Dept of Environmental Science, Policy, & Management, Berkeley, CA, United States, (2)ENSTA ParisTech, Department of Engineering, Paris, France, (3)Forerunner Research Inc., Dartmouth, Canada, (4)Picarro Inc, Santa Clara, CA, United States
Accurate measurements of soil greenhouse gas fluxes are critical for determining the role of ecosystem dynamics, both natural and managed, in climate change. We compared concentration profile methods with static, forced diffusion, and automated flux chambers using a combination of infrared gas analyzers (IRGA), gas chromatography, and cavity ring-down laser absorption spectroscopy (Picarro G2508) during field campaigns in managed ecosystems in California. At a drained peatland pasture site, we observed large differences between methods (fluxes ranged between 2-15 µmol CO2 m-2 s-1). However, low temporal/high spatial replication measurements (manual LI6400 chamber measurements; n=6 collars) encompassed the full range of CO2 fluxes observed across all other methods. This suggests that the majority of variability in CO2 emissions was due to high spatial variation in soil respiration and not due to methodological differences across measurement systems. At a dry upland pasture site, water, nitrate solution and manure were applied during the experimental period to expand the range of greenhouse fluxes. Preliminary results showed good agreement of gas fluxes between static and automatic chamber sampling. We observed large CO2 and N2O fluxes after manure application with both methods. The two chamber types were highly significantly correlated for N2O (slope=0.74, r2=0.94). Mean CH4 fluxes measured by static chambers was -0.36 µg cm-2 h-1, similar to the -0.57 µg cm-2 h-1 measured by the automatic chamber and Picarro analyzer during the study period. Overall, our results suggest that both automated and static chamber methods are in good agreement, but automated chambers are advantageous for capturing diel dynamics and pulse responses to experimental treatments. Our results also highlight the importance of spatial replication, which can be difficult to achieve using expensive automated chambers. We suggest future research efforts to seek a combination of high spatially replicated manual static chambers and continuous sampling methods.