GP43A-3625:
Chemical Remagnetization of Jurassic Carbonates and a Primary Paleolatitude of Lower Cretaceous Volcaniclastic Rocks of the Tibetan Himalaya

Thursday, 18 December 2014
Wentao Huang1,2, Douwe J J Van Hinsbergen1, Mark J Dekkers1, Eduardo Garzanti3, Guillaume Dupont Nivet1,2, Peter C Lippert4, Xiaochun Li5, Marco Maffione1, Cor G Langereis1, Xiumian Hu6, Zhaojie Guo2 and Paul A Kapp4, (1)Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, (2)Peking University, Beijing, China, (3)University of Milan - Bicocca, Milan, Italy, (4)University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States, (5)The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, (6)Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
Abstract:
Paleolatitudes for the Tibetan Himalaya Zone based on paleomagnetic inclinations provide kinematic constraints of the passive northern Indian margin and the extent of ‘Greater India’ before the India-Asia collision. Here, we present a paleomagnetic investigation of the Jurassic (carbonates) to Lower Cretaceous (volcaniclastic rocks) Wölong section of the Tibetan Himalaya in the Everest region. The carbonates yield positive fold tests, suggesting that the remanent magnetizations have a pre-folding origin. However, detailed paleomagnetic analyses, rock magnetic tests, end-member modeling of acquisition curves of isothermal remanent magnetization, and petrographic studies reveal that the magnetic carrier of the Jurassic carbonates is authigenic magnetite, whereas the dominant magnetic carrier of the Lower Cretaceous volcaniclastic rocks is detrital magnetite. We conclude that the Jurassic carbonates were remagnetized, whereas the Lower Cretaceous volcaniclastics retain a primary remanence. We hypothesize that remagnetization of the Jurassic carbonates was probably caused by the oxidation of early diagenetic pyrite to magnetite within the time interval at ~86-84 Ma during the latest Cretaceous Normal Superchron and earliest deposition of Cretaceous oceanic red beds in the Tibetan Himalaya.

The remagnetization of the limestones prevents determining the size of ‘Greater India’ during Jurassic time. Instead, a paleolatitude of the Tibetan Himalaya of 23.8±2.1° S at ~86-84 Ma is suggested. This value is lower than the expected paleolatitude of India from apparent polar wander path (APWP). The volcaniclastic rocks with the primary remanence, however, yielded a Lower Cretaceous paleolatitude of Tibetan Himalaya of 55.5±3° S, fitting well with the APWP of India.