H31P-07:
Flow of concentrated suspensions through fractures: Significant in-plane velocity variations caused by small variations in solid concentration

Wednesday, 17 December 2014: 9:30 AM
Ricardo Medina1, Russell L Detwiler1, Joseph P Morris2,3, Romain Prioul2 and Jean Desroches4, (1)University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States, (2)Schlumberger-Doll Research, Cambridge, MA, United States, (3)Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, United States, (4)Schlumberger, Paris, France
Abstract:
Flow of fluids containing large concentrations of suspended solids through narrow fractures is important in subsurface processes where the permeability of the fracture is greater than the surrounding matrix (i.e. sand intrusion, environmental remediation, hydraulic fracturing, magma flow, and mud volcanoes). We present results from experiments in which a high concentration (50% by volume) of granular solids suspended in a non-Newtonian carrier fluid (0.75% guar gum in water) flowed through a transparent parallel-plate fracture. Digital particle-image-velocimetry analysis demonstrates the development of a strongly heterogeneous velocity field within the fracture that persists for the length of the fracture. The highest velocities were observed along the no-flow boundaries and the lowest velocities along the centerline; we carried out numerical simulations and additional experiments to elucidate this surprising result. Depth-averaged (2D) simulations using a rheological model of concentrated suspensions of mono-disperse solids in Newtonian fluids reproduced experimental observations of the velocity field when small (3%) variations in solid concentration were introduced. Such concentration variability led to significant (factor of two) velocity variations within the fracture yet negligible changes in observed pressure gradients. Two plausible explanations for solid-concentration variability are: (i) shearing of the fluid at the no-flow boundaries induced these concentration variations or (ii) they were induced by upstream boundary conditions. A second set of experiments was performed to identify which of the two phenomena caused the observed velocity variations. A narrow obstruction was placed along the centerline of the same cell; reduced velocities along the obstruction were observed, indicating that the observed velocity variations are the result of solid concentration heterogeneities that occurred in the upstream boundary and not from concentration heterogeneities developing inside the fracture. Our results suggest that small variations in solid concentration can lead to significant velocity variations such that a simple fracture-averaged conductivity may not reliably predict transport of suspended solids within fractures.