Snow Pattern Delineation, Scaling, Fidelity, and Landscape Factors

Abstract:

In many snow-covered landscapes, snow tends to be shallow or deep in the same locations year after year. As snowmelt progresses in spring, areas of shallow snow become snow-free earlier than areas with deep snow. This pattern (Sturm and Wagner 2010) could likely be used to inform or improve modeled snow depth estimates where ground measurements are not collected; however, we must be certain of their utility before ingesting them into model calculations. Do patterns, as we detect them, have a relationship with earlier measured snow distributions? Second, are certain areas on the landscape likely to yield patterns that are influenced too highly by melting to be useful? Our Imnavait Creek Study Area (11 by 19 km) is on Alaska’s North Slope, where we have examined a vast library of spring satellite imagery (ranging from mostly snow-covered to mostly snow-free). Landsat TM Imagery has been collected from the early 1980s-present, and the temporal and spatial resolution is roughly two weeks and 30 m, respectively. High resolution satellite imagery (WorldView 1, WorldView 2, IKONOS) has been obtained from 2010-2013 for the same area with almost daily- to monthly-temporal and at 2.5 m spatial resolutions, respectively. We found that there is a striking similarity among patterns from year to year across the span of decades and resolutions. However, the relationship of pattern with observed snow depths was strong in some areas and less clear in others. Overall, we suspect spatial scaling, spatial mismatch, sampling errors, and melt patterns explain most of the areas of pattern and depth disparity.