V11B-4715:
An Experimental Investigation of Ice Melting and Heat Transfer Characteristics from Submerged Jets of Hot Water, Implications for Subglacial Volcanic Eruptions

Monday, 15 December 2014
Hamidreza Jamshidnia, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland and Magnus Tumi Gudmundsson, University of Iceland, Nordic Volcanological Center, Institute of Earth Sciences, Reykjavik, Iceland
Abstract:
The rates and processes of energy transfer in water-filled cavities formed under glaciers by geothermal and volcanic activity has been investigated by designing, developing, and using an experimental setup in which hot water jets can impinge on an ice block. Systematic sets of experimental runs typically lasting 60-90 seconds with water jet temperatures in the range 10° - 90°C have been performed with initial ice block temparature. It is quantitatively found that heat flux from flowing water to ice is linearly dependent on temperature of the jet flow. The hot water jet meltes out a cavity into the ice block during the process. The cavities had steep to vertical sides with a doming roof. Some of the ice blocks used had trapped air bubbles. In these cases melting of the ice lead to the trapping of air at the top of the cavity, partially insulating the roof from the hot water jet. Such cavities had lower aspect ratios (height/width) and flatter and less dome shaped roofs than did cavities in ice blocks with little or no air bubbles. The overall heat transfer rate in cavity formation varied with jet temperature from <100 kW m-2 to ~900 kW m-2 while melting rates in the vertical direction yield heat transfer rates of 200-1200 kW m-2. The observed experimental heat transfer rates can be compared to data on subglacial melting observed for ice cauldrons in various settings in Iceland. For the lowest experimental temperatures the numbers are comparable to those found for geothermal water in cool, subglacial water bodies and above subglacial flowpaths of jökulhlaups. However, the highest experimental rates for 80-90°C jets are 3-10 times less than inferred from observations of recent subglacial eruptions (2000-4000 kW m-2). This can indicate that single phase liquid water convection alone is not sufficient to explain the rates seen in recent subglacial eruptions in Iceland, suggesting that during such eruptions forced two-phase (liquid and steam) or three phase (liquid, steam and pyroclasts) convection is common. Further recommendations may also be presented for future research in this field.