SH33B-07:
Forecasting Bz at Earth - an Operational Perspective

Wednesday, 17 December 2014: 3:10 PM
Victor J Pizzo, NOAA Space Weather Prediction, Boulder, CO, United States
Abstract:
Forecasting the magnetic structure of an Earth-directed CME remains a difficult challenge, even with all the observational and modeling assets available today. Coronagraph and heliospheric imager data provide the only tangible information on CME structure near the Sun, but they specifically measure the mass distribution and offer only vague hints at the magnetic configuration. As input to models of the interplanetary medium, this information currently enables prediction of the arrival time at 1 AU within a statistical 8-hour or so window, but no forecast of the magnetic content of the CME. We discuss how the introduction of time-dependent ambient flows may impact the estimation of magnetic draping fields at the front of a CME, and we examine how the interplanetary evolution of a CME with an embedded magnetic cloud (MC) differs from that with a purely hydrodynamic driver, as in current operational models. In both cases the driver represents a localized injection of momentum, which dominates the dynamics. However, the MC case presents two additional dynamic elements: (1) the magnetic tension and high Alfven speeds in the cloud provide a rigidity that tends to preserve the initial shape of the driver; (2) the edges of the MC interact directly with the swept-up spiral magnetic ambient field, leading to erosion of the internal fields. In both cases, the hypersonic flow conditions and the geometric spreading of the predominantly radial motion tends to keep the interactions local, such that different parts of the structure may experience quite different evolution with heliocentric distance. The resulting localized deformations make the interpretation of the true configuration of such structures difficult to infer from in situ observations and severely complicate our ability to forecast accurately the magnetic structure expected at Earth. A key issue confronting any purported forecast scheme for CME magnetic content is the definition of a “good fit” between prediction and observation – this is not at all a straightforward task and real progress in this area hinges upon sensible and honest evaluation forecast performance.