B43H-07:
Comparing Individual Tree Segmentation Based on High Resolution Multispectral Image and Lidar Data

Thursday, 18 December 2014: 3:10 PM
Pengfeng Xiao1, Maggi Kelly1 and Qinghua Guo2, (1)University of California Berkeley, Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, Berkeley, CA, United States, (2)University of California Merced, School of Engineering, Merced, CA, United States
Abstract:
This study compares the use of high-resolution multispectral WorldView images and high density Lidar data for individual tree segmentation. The application focuses on coniferous and deciduous forests in the Sierra Nevada Mountains. The tree objects are obtained in two ways: a hybrid region-merging segmentation method with multispectral images, and a top-down and bottom-up region-growing method with Lidar data.

The hybrid region-merging method is used to segment individual tree from multispectral images. It integrates the advantages of global-oriented and local-oriented region-merging strategies into a unified framework. The globally most-similar pair of regions is used to determine the starting point of a growing region. The merging iterations are constrained within the local vicinity, thus the segmentation is accelerated and can reflect the local context.

The top-down region-growing method is adopted in coniferous forest to delineate individual tree from Lidar data. It exploits the spacing between the tops of trees to identify and group points into a single tree based on simple rules of proximity and likely tree shape. The bottom-up region-growing method based on the intensity and 3D structure of Lidar data is applied in deciduous forest. It segments tree trunks based on the intensity and topological relationships of the points, and then allocate other points to exact tree crowns according to distance.

The accuracies for each method are evaluated with field survey data in several test sites, covering dense and sparse canopy. Three types of segmentation results are produced: true positive represents a correctly segmented individual tree, false negative represents a tree that is not detected and assigned to a nearby tree, and false positive represents that a point or pixel cluster is segmented as a tree that does not in fact exist. They respectively represent correct-, under-, and over-segmentation. Three types of index are compared for segmenting individual tree from multispectral image and Lidar data: recall, precision and F-score.

This work explores the tradeoff between the expensive Lidar data and inexpensive multispectral image. The conclusion will guide the optimal data selection in different density canopy areas for individual tree segmentation, and contribute to the field of forest remote sensing.