GP51A:
ESA's Swarm Mission, One Year in Space III Posters

Friday, 19 December 2014: 8:00 AM-12:20 PM
Chairs:  Gauthier Hulot, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France and David J Knudsen, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
Primary Conveners:  Gauthier Hulot, IPGP, Paris, France
Co-conveners:  Hermann Luhr, Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, GFZ, Potsdam, Germany, Eigil A Friis-Christensen, DTU, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark and David J Knudsen, Univ Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
OSPA Liaisons:  David J Knudsen, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

 
In-flight calibration of the experimental Absolute Scalar Magnetometer vector mode on board the Swarm satellites
Jean-Michel Leger1, Thomas Jager1, Francois Bertrand1, Viviane Cattin1, Isabelle Fratter2, Laura Brocco3, Pierre Vigneron3, Xavier Lalanne3 and Gauthier Hulot3, (1)CEA-LETI, Grenoble, France, (2)CNES French National Center for Space Studies, Toulouse Cedex 09, France, (3)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France
 
Swarm's Absolute Scalar Magnetometers Burst Mode Results
Pierdavide Coisson1, Pierre Vigneron1, Gauthier Hulot1, Raul Crespo Grau1,2, Laura Brocco1, Xavier Lalanne1, Olivier Sirol1, Jean-Michel Leger3, Thomas Jager3, Francois Bertrand3, Axel Boness3 and Isabelle Fratter4, (1)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France, (2)Observatorio Geofisico Central, Instituto Geografico Nacional, Madrid, Spain, (3)CEA-LETI, Grenoble, France, (4)CNES French National Center for Space Studies, Toulouse Cedex 09, France
 
Comparing Swarm's Nominal Level1b Magnetic Data and ASM Vector Field Experimental Data: a Convenient Tool for Understanding Data Quality Issues.
Laura Brocco1, Gauthier Hulot1, Pierre Vigneron1, Vincent Lesur2, Jean-Michel Leger3, Thomas Jager3, Francois Bertrand3, Olivier Sirol1, Xavier Lalanne1, Axel Boness3, Viviane Cattin3 and Isabelle Fratter4, (1)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France, (2)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (3)CEA-LETI, Grenoble, France, (4)CNES French National Center for Space Studies, Toulouse Cedex 09, France
 
A 2015 Igrf Candidate Model Based on Swarm’s Experimental ASM Vector Mode Data
Pierre Vigneron1, Gauthier Hulot1, Nils Olsen2, Jean-Michel Leger3, Thomas Jager3, Laura Brocco1, Olivier Sirol1, Pierdavide Coisson1, Xavier Lalanne1, Arnaud Chulliat4, Francois Bertrand3, Axel Boness3 and Isabelle Fratter5, (1)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France, (2)Technical University of Denmark - Space, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark, (3)CEA-LETI, Grenoble, France, (4)National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, CO, United States, (5)CNES French National Center for Space Studies, Toulouse Cedex 09, France
 
The Swarm Initial Field Model – a Model of the Earth’s Magnetic Field for 2014 Determined From One Year of Swarm Satellite Constellation Data
Nils Olsen, Technical University of Denmark - Space, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark, Gauthier Hulot, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France, Vincent Lesur, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, Christopher C Finlay, DTU Space, Lyngby, Denmark, Ciaran Beggan, British Geological Survey Keyworth, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom, Arnaud Chulliat, National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, CO, United States and Terence J Sabaka, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Planetary Geodynamics Laboratory, Greenbelt, MD, United States
 
Updating the CHAOS series of field models using Swarm data and resulting candidate models for IGRF-12
Christopher C Finlay, Nils Olsen and Lars Tøffner-clausen, Technical University of Denmark - Space, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
 
Describing Temporal Variations of the Geomagnetic Field through a Modified Virtual Observatory Scheme: Application to SWARM Measurements
Diana Saturnino1, Benoit Langlais1, Hagay Amit1 and Mioara Mandea2, (1)LPGN Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique de Nantes, Nantes Cedex 03, France, (2)CNES - Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, Paris, France
 
Jerks in Stochastic Synthetic Magnetic Fields
William J Brown1, Jonathan E Mound1 and Philip W Livermore2, (1)University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2, United Kingdom, (2)University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
 
Forward Modeling of the Fennoscandian Lithospheric Field Using Spherical Prisms
Eldar Baykiev1, Joerg Ebbing2, Marco Broenner3 and Karl W J Fabian3, (1)Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, (2)University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany, (3)Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim, Norway
 
Possibilities for Observations of Electromagnetic Perturbations Related to Seismic Activity with Swarm Satellites
Angelo De Santis, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy, Mioara Mandea, CNES - Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, Paris, France and Georgios Balasis, National Observatory of Athens, Athens, Greece
 
Equatorial Electric Fields Derived from Swarm Magnetometer Data
Patrick Alken1, Stefan Maus1, Pierre Vigneron2, Olivier Sirol2, Gauthier Hulot2 and Arnaud Chulliat3, (1)University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France, (3)National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder, CO, United States
 
Comparing IRI and IRI-Real-Time with SWARM Electron Density Data
Dieter Bilitza1,2, Ivan A Galkin3, Claudia Stolle4, Artem Vesnin3 and Bodo W Reinisch3,5, (1)George Mason University Fairfax, Fairfax, VA, United States, (2)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 672, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (3)Univ Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States, (4)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (5)Lowell Digisonde International, Lowell, MA, United States
 
Can we derive the current density from three point LEO measurements of the magnetic field perturbations?
Matthew Potter1, Jesper W Gjerloev2, Marc Muhleisen3, Mathew Friel3, Polly Martin3, Guan Le4, Claudia Stolle5 and Hermann Luhr6, (1)Applied Physics Laboratory Johns Hopkins, Laurel, MD, United States, (2)Johns Hopkins University - Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, United States, (3)Georgetown Day School, Washington DC, DC, United States, (4)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (5)Technical University of Denmark - Space, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark, (6)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany
 
Field-aligned Currents’ Scale Analysis Performed by the Swarm Constellation
Hermann Luhr1, Jaeheung Park1, Jesper W Gjerloev2, Jan Rauberg1, Ingo Michaelis1, Guan Le3, Jose M.G. Merayo4 and Peter Brauer4, (1)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (2)Johns Hopkins University - Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, United States, (3)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (4)DTU Space, Lyngby, Denmark
 
Structure of small-scale field-aligned currents at middle and low latitudes having lower atmospheric origin
Kunihito Nakanishi1, Toshihiko Iyemori1, Hermann Luhr2,3 and Tadashi Aoyama1, (1)Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, (2)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (3)Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, GFZ, Potsdam, Germany
 
Small-scale field-aligned currents caused by tropical cyclones as observed by the SWARM satellites above the ionosphere
Tadashi Aoyama, Toshihiko Iyemori and Kunihito Nakanishi, Kyoto University, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto, Japan
 
On the Magnetic Field Spatial Fluctuation Features at Swarm’s Orbit
Paola De Michelis1, Giuseppe Consolini2 and Roberta Tozzi1, (1)Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy, (2)INAF - Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Rome, Italy
 
Investigating Night-time Ionospheric Currents by Swarm Magnetic Data
Roberta Tozzi, Michael Pezzopane and Paola De Michelis, Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Roma, Italy
 
Swarm Observations of Low-altitude Cusp Ion Upflow
Johnathan K Burchill1, David J Knudsen1 and Stephan C Buchert2, (1)University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, (2)IRF Swedish Institute of Space Physics Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
 
Observation of Polar Cap Patches and Calculation of Gradient Drift Instability Growth Times: A Swarm Case Study
Andres Spicher1, Taylor Grant Cameron2, Eric M. Grono2, Kateryna Yakymenko3, Stephan C Buchert4, Lasse Clausen1, David J Knudsen2, Kathryn A McWilliams3 and Joran Idar Moen1, (1)University of Oslo, Physics Department, Oslo, Norway, (2)University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, (3)University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, (4)IRF Swedish Institute of Space Physics Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
 
Swarm In Situ Observations of F-Region Polar Cap Patches Created by Cusp Ionization
Lindsay Victoria Goodwin1, Blessing Iserhienrhien1, David M Miles2, Swadesh Patra3, Christer van der Meeren4, Stephan C Buchert5, Johnathan K Burchill6, Lasse Clausen3, David J Knudsen6, Kathryn A McWilliams1 and Jøran Moen3, (1)University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, (2)University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, (3)University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, (4)University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, (5)IRF Swedish Institute of Space Physics Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden, (6)University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada