S53A:
Bayesian Methods in Solid Earth Geophysics: Sources to Structure II Posters

Friday, 19 December 2014: 1:40 PM-6:00 PM
Chairs:  Sarah E. Minson1, Zacharie Duputel1, Romain Jolivet1 and Thomas Bodin2, (1)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States(2)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
Primary Conveners:  Zacharie Duputel, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
Co-conveners:  Romain Jolivet, Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States, Sarah E. Minson, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States and Thomas Bodin, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
OSPA Liaisons:  Sarah E. Minson, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

 
Landslide caracteristics determination using bayesian inversion and seismic recording
Laurent Moretti1, Anne Mangeney1, Yann Capdeville2, Eleonore Stutzmann1, Thomas Bodin3 and Francois Bouchut4, (1)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France, (2)CNRS, Paris Cedex 16, France, (3)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, (4)Université Marne la Vallée, CNRS, Marne la Vallée, France
 
Applying a Hidden Markov Model-Based Event Detection and Classification Algorithm to Apollo Lunar Seismic Data
Brigitte Knapmeyer-Endrun, MPI for Solar System Research, Goettingen, Germany and Conny Hammer, University Potsdam, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Potsdam, Germany
 
Reducing Nonuniqueness in Finite Source Inversion Using Rotational Ground Motions
Moritz Bernauer, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany, Andreas Fichtner, ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland and Heiner Igel, Ludwig-Maximilian Univ, Muenchen, Germany
 
Inversion for slip distribution for the 2012 Costa Rica earthquake
Kimberly A McCormack1, Marc A Hesse1 and Georg Stadler2, (1)University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States, (2)UT Austin, Austin, TX, United States
 
A Note on the Regularization of Linear Inversion for Estimating Quasi-Static Fault Slip Distributions
Alberto Ardid Segura1, Francisco H Ortega Culaciati1 and Mark Simons2, (1)University of Chile, Department of Geophysics, Santiago, Chile, (2)California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
 
Kinematic source inversions of teleseismic data based on the QUESO library for uncertainty quantification and prediction
Olaf Zielke1, Damon McDougall2, Paul Martin Mai1 and Ivo Babuska2, (1)KAUST, Thuwal, Makkah, VA, United States, (2)University of Texas at Austin, ICES, Austin, TX, United States
 
The Study of Fault Valve Behaviour by Using Microearthquake Source Parameters
Strong Wen1, Wei-Jhe Wu2, Yi-Zen Chang1, Chauhuei Chen3 and Yu-Lien Yeh2, (1)NCREE National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering of Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, (2)Graduate Institute of Seismology National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi County, Taiwan, (3)Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Chiayi, Taiwan
 
A Trial for Improvement in Reproducibility of Spatial Distribution of Afterslip in Geodetic Data Inversion
Takane Hori1, Ryoko Nakata1, Tatsu Kuwatani2 and Masato Okada3, (1)JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan, (2)Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, (3)Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan
 
Can uncertainty of earthquake focal mechanisms impact the significance of results on tidal triggering?
Magda Bucholc1, Sandy Steacy2 and Nuno Simão2, (1)University of Ulster, Londonderry, BT48, United Kingdom, (2)University of Ulster, Coleraine, United Kingdom
 
Uncertainty analysis of the 2009 L'Aquila rupture model using one- and three-dimensional crustal structure
Hoby Njara T. Razafindrakoto, Walter Imperatori and Paul Martin Mai, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
 
Bayesian Estimation of 2005 Fukuoka (Japan) Earthquake Source Parameters and Associated Coulomb Failure Stress Changes from InSAR and GPS
Rishabh Dutta, Teng Wang and Sigurjon Jonsson, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia
 
Estimation of completeness magnitude with a Bayesian modeling of daily and weekly variations in earthquake detectability
Takaki Iwata, Inst. Stat. Math (ISM), Tokyo, Japan; Tokiwa University, College of Community Development, Ibaraki, Japan
 
A Bayesian Method to Apply the Results of Multiple-Event Seismic Location to a Subsequent Event
Gardar Johannesson and Stephen C Myers, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, United States
 
Rapid Bayesian point source inversion using pattern recognition --- bridging the gap between regional scaling relations and accurate physical modelling
Paul Kaeufl1, Ralph W.L. De Wit1, Andrew P Valentine1 and Jeannot Trampert2, (1)Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3584, Netherlands, (2)Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
 
Hierarchical Bayesian Inversion for the Centroid Moment Tensor
Marija Mustac and Hrvoje Tkalcic, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
 
A Hierarchical Bayesian Approcah for Earthquake Location and Data Uncertainty Estimation in 3D Heterogeneous Media
Pierre Arroucau1,2 and Susana Custodio1,2, (1)Centro de Geofisica, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, (2)Instituto Dom Luiz, Centro de Geofisica da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
 
Transdimensional Bayesian Joint Inversion of Complementary Seismic Observables with Realistic Data Uncertainties
Chao Gao and Vedran Lekic, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, United States
 
Towards 2D Bayesian Tomography of Receiver Functions
Anandaroop Ray, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, United States; Chevron Corporation Houston, Geophysical R&D, Houston, TX, United States, Thomas Bodin, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States and Kerry Key, IGPP/SIO/UCSD, La Jolla, CA, United States
 
Transdimensional imaging of random velocity inhomogeneities in Nankai subduction zone
Tsutomu Takahashi1, Koichiro Obana1, Yojiro Yamamoto1, Yuka Kaiho1, Ayako Nakanishi1, Shuichi Kodaira1 and Yoshiyuki Kaneda1,2, (1)JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan, (2)Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
 
A Multi-scale Framework for Trans-dimensional Tomography
Rhys Hawkins and Malcolm Sambridge, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
 
Stochastic Monte-Carlo Markov Chain Inversions on Models Regionalized Using Receiver Functions
Carene S Larmat1, Monica Maceira1, Yasuyuki Kato2, Thomas Bodin3, Marco Calo4, Barbara A Romanowicz3, Chengping Chai5 and Charles J Ammon6, (1)Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States, (2)RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science (CEMS), Saitama, Japan, (3)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, (4)Berkeley Seismological Lab, Berkeley, CA, United States, (5)Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, University Park, PA, United States, (6)Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, Department of Geosciences, University Park, PA, United States
 
Robustness of Global Radial Anisotropy Models of the Upper Mantle
Zheng Xing1, Caroline Beghein2 and Kaiqing Yuan1, (1)University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (2)University of California Los Angeles, Earth, Space, and Planetary Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, United States
 
Bayesian Inversion of Broadband Surface Waves Dispersion Curves for Shear Velocity Structure and Anisotropy of the Crust and Upper Mantle
Matteo Ravenna and Sergei Lebedev, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Dublin, Ireland
 
A Bayesian approach to linear inverse problems in seismic tomography
Yuan Tian1, Ying Zhou1,2, Julianne Chung2, Matthias Chung2 and Jieyuan Ning1, (1)School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China, (2)Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, United States
 
Spherical Harmonic Analysis via Bayesian Inference
Jack Broderick Muir and Hrvoje Tkalcic, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
 
See more of: Seismology