A33F:
Constraining Biosphere-Atmosphere Exchange Processes using Remote-Sensing and In Situ Networks I Posters


Session ID#: 7897

Session Description:
This session focuses on modeling frameworks, both top-down and bottom-up approaches, that investigate biosphere-atmosphere exchange processes using atmospheric data from various observational platforms, both in-situ as well as remotely-sensed. We particularly invite contributions on: 1) estimation and/or verification of greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets of biospheric and anthropogenic fluxes; 2) inverse models and data assimilation systems for obtaining GHG budgets, or strategies for coupling atmospheric inversions to biogeochemical models; 3) the use of multiple species (e.g. H2O and CO2, carbon isotopes, OCS and CO2) to provide insight into process-based model formulations; 4) research focusing on the constraint on GHG budgets induced by new data from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) and the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) missions.
Primary Convener:  Abhishek Chatterjee, GMAO, Greenbelt, MD, United States
Conveners:  Andrew E Schuh, Colorado State University, CIRA, Fort Collins, CO, United States, Mathias Goeckede, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany and Abhishek Chatterjee, GMAO, Greenbelt, MD, United States
Chairs:  Abhishek Chatterjee, GMAO, Greenbelt, MD, United States and Andrew E Schuh, Colorado State University, CIRA, Fort Collins, CO, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Abhishek Chatterjee, GMAO, Greenbelt, MD, United States
Co-Organized with:
Atmospheric Sciences, and Biogeosciences

Cross-Listed:
  • B - Biogeosciences
  • GC - Global Environmental Change
Index Terms:

0315 Biosphere/atmosphere interactions [ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE]
0322 Constituent sources and sinks [ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION AND STRUCTURE]
0414 Biogeochemical cycles, processes, and modeling [BIOGEOSCIENCES]
0428 Carbon cycling [BIOGEOSCIENCES]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Bayesian optimization of modeled CO2 fluxes in Oregon using a dense tower network, aircraft campaigns, and the community land model 4.5 (61016)
Andres Schmidt, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States, Stephen A Conley, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States, Mathias Goeckede, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany, Arlyn Andrews, NOAA Earth System Research Lab, Boulder, CO, United States, Kenneth Alan Masarie, NOAA, Boulder, CO, United States and Colm Sweeney, NOAA, Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, United States
Evaluating and Improving the Performance of Common Land Model Using FLUXNET Data (81376)
Xiangxiang Zhang1,2, Yong Jiu Dai1 and Robert E Dickinson2, (1)Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China, (2)University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
Recent Pattern of Seasonal and Interannual Variability Inferred From Data-Driven Global Terrestrial Net CO2 Exchange (77004)
Masayuki Kondo, JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan and Kazuhito Ichii, JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Department of Environmental Geochemical Cycle Research, Kanagawa, Japan
Impact of drought on the CO2 atmospheric growth rate 2010-2012 from the NASA Carbon Monitoring System Flux (CMS-Flux) Project (74120)
Kevin W Bowman1, Junjie Liu2, Nick Parazoo3, Zhe Jiang4, A. Anthony Bloom1, Meemong Lee2, Dimitris Menemenlis4, Michelle Gierach5, George James Collatz6 and Kevin R Gurney7, (1)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (2)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (5)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Oceans and Ice Group, Pasadena, CA, United States, (6)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (7)Northern Arizona University, School of Informatics, Computing and Cyber Systems, Flagstaff, AZ, United States
Quantification of Transport Errors in Regional CO2 Inversions with a Calibrated WRF-Chem Physics-based Ensemble (81244)
Liza I Diaz Isaac, Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, University Park, PA, United States, Thomas Lauvaux, Pennsylvania State University Main Campus, Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, University Park, United States, Kenneth J Davis, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, University Park, United States and Marc Bocquet, U. Paris-Est, Ecole des Ponts ParisTech, Marne la Vallee Cedex 2, 77455, France
Quantifying UK emissions of carbon dioxide using an integrative measurement strategy (66054)
Paul Palmer1, Siegfried Gonzi1 and NERC GAUGE Science Team, (1)University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Towards Top-down Constraints on Regional Sources and Sinks of CO2 Imposed by Column Observations: a High-resolution Inverse Modeling Approach (79535)
Dhanyalekshmi Pillai1, Michael Alexander Buchwitz2, Christoph Gerbig3, Julia Marshall3, Thomas Koch3, Maximilian Reuter2, Heinrich Bovensmann2 and John Philip Burrows FRS2, (1)Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Bhopal, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bhopal, India, (2)University of Bremen, Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP), Bremen, Germany, (3)Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Biogeochemical Signals, Jena, Germany
An Inversion Analysis of Recent Variability in Natural CO2 Fluxes Using GOSAT and In Situ Observations (84146)
James S Wang1, Stephan R Kawa2, David F Baker3, George James Collatz2 and Lesley E Ott4, (1)NASA Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (2)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (3)Organization Not Listed, Washington, DC, United States, (4)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, MD, United States
Boundary Values for Regional to Continental Scale Greenhouse Gas Flux Estimation (65528)
Arlyn Andrews1, Sourish Basu2, Joshua Simon Benmergui3, Edward J Dlugokencky4, Anna Karion5, Kenneth Alan Masarie6, Anna M Michalak7, Marikate Ellis Mountain8, Thomas Nehrkorn9, Ariel F Stein10, Colm Sweeney2, Pieter P Tans2, Kirk W Thoning11, Michael Trudeau1,12 and Vineet Yadav13, (1)NOAA Earth System Research Lab, Boulder, CO, United States, (2)NOAA, Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, United States, (3)Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States, (4)NOAA Boulder, Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, United States, (5)National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, Gaithersburg, MD, United States, (6)NOAA, Boulder, CO, United States, (7)Carnegie Institution for Science Washington, Washington, DC, United States, (8)Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., Lexington, MA, United States, (9)Atmospheric and Environmental Research Lexington, Lexington, MA, United States, (10)NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College Park, MD, United States, (11)NOAA/ESRL Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, United States, (12)Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States, (13)Carnegie Institution, Stanford, CA, United States
A Lagrangian Assimilation System for North American Carbon Flux Estimates (61444)
Huilin Chen1, Wei He2, Wouter Peters2, Arlyn Andrews3, Andrew R Jacobson4, Colm Sweeney4, Ian T Baker5, Ingrid Theodora van der Laan-Luijkx6, Ivar van der Velde2 and Pieter P Tans7, (1)Nanjing University, Nanjing, China, (2)Centre for Isotope Research, Groningen, Netherlands, (3)NOAA Earth System Research Lab, Boulder, CO, United States, (4)University of Colorado at Boulder, CIRES, Boulder, CO, United States, (5)Colorado State University, CIRA, Fort Collins, United States, (6)Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands, (7)NOAA, Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, United States
Integrating diverse observations of North American CH4 into flux inversions in CarbonTrackerLagrange-CH4 (74710)
Joshua Simon Benmergui, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States, Arlyn Andrews, NOAA Earth System Research Lab, Boulder, CO, United States, Kirk W Thoning, NOAA/ESRL Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, United States, Michael Trudeau, Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States, Scot M Miller, Harvard University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, MA, United States, Edward J Dlugokencky, NOAA Boulder, Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, United States, Lori Bruhwiler, NOAA Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States, Kenneth Alan Masarie, NOAA, Boulder, CO, United States, Doug E. J. Worthy, Environment Canada, Toronto, Canada, Colm Sweeney, NOAA, Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, United States, Marc Laurenz Fischer, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States, Ankur R Desai, University of Wisconsin Madison, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Madison, WI, United States, Thomas Nehrkorn, Atmospheric and Environmental Research Lexington, Lexington, MA, United States, Marikate Ellis Mountain, Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., Lexington, MA, United States and Steven C Wofsy, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
Constraining the 2012-2014 growing season Alaskan methane budget using CARVE aircraft measurements (73740)
Sean Hartery1, Rachel Ying-Wen Chang2, Roisin Commane3, Jakob Lindaas3, Scot M Miller4, Steven C Wofsy4, Anna Karion5, Colm Sweeney6, Charles E Miller7, Steven J Dinardo7, Nick Steiner8, Kyle C McDonald9, Jennifer D Watts10, Donatella Zona11, Walter C Oechel12, John S Kimball13, John Henderson14 and Marikate Ellis Mountain15, (1)Augusta University, Chemistry & Physics, Augusta, GA, United States, (2)Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, (3)Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States, (4)Harvard University, Cambridge, United States, (5)National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, United States, (6)NOAA, Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, United States, (7)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (8)City College of New York, New York. NY, USA, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, New York, NY, United States, (9)CUNY City College of New York, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, New York, NY, United States, (10)University of Montana, Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, W.A. Franke College of Forestry & Conservation, Missoula, MT, United States, (11)San Diego State University, Department of Biology, San Diego, United States, (12)San Diego State University, Department of Biology, San Diego, CA, United States, (13)University of Montana, Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group, W.A. Franke College of Forestry & Conservation, Missoula, United States, (14)Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Lexington, MA, United States, (15)Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., Lexington, MA, United States
Carbon Flux Estimation in Southeast Asia using a Eulerian-Lagrangian Coupled Inversion System and Observational Data from Multiple Platforms (76623)
Misa Ishizawa1, Tomoko Shirai1, Yukio Terao1, Hitoshi Mukai1, Shohei Nomura1, Maznorian Mohamad2, Mohad Firdaus Jahaya2, Makoto Inoue3, Isamu Morino4, Yukio Yoshida4, Osamu Uchino4, Ruslan Zhuravlev5,6, Alexander Ganshin5,6 and Shamil S Maksyutov1, (1)National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, (2)Malaysian Meteorological Department, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, (3)Akita Prefectural University, Akita, Japan, (4)National Institute for Environmental Studies, Satellite Observation Center, Tsukuba, Japan, (5)Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia, (6)Central Aerological Observatory, Dolgoprudny, Russia
Influence of Fossil Fuel Emissions on CO2 Flux Estimation by Atmospheric Inversions (68869)
Tazu Saeki, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan, Prabir Kumar Patra, JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Japan, Ingrid Theodora van der Laan-Luijkx, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, Netherlands and Wouter Peters, University of Groningen, Center for Isotope Research, Groningen, Netherlands

See more of: Atmospheric Sciences