S43B:
Seismology Contributions: Earthquake Ground Motions and Engineering Seismology II Posters


Session ID#: 9823

Session Description:
Contributions on ground motion prediction, amplification, seismic hazards, engineering seismology, or near-surface interactions that do not naturally fall under the scope of any of the special sessions.
Primary Convener:  Carl Tape, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, United States
Convener:  Colleen A Dalton, Brown University, Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Providence, RI, United States
Chairs:  Erin A Wirth, Yale University, New Haven, United States and Carl Tape, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, Fairbanks, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Erin A Wirth, Yale University, New Haven, United States
Index Terms:

7212 Earthquake ground motions and engineering seismology [SEISMOLOGY]
7299 General or miscellaneous [SEISMOLOGY]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Testing the SH1D Assumption for Geotechnical Site and Basin Response Using 3D Finite Difference Modeling (70903)
Dr. Arthur J Rodgers, PhD and Arben Pitarka, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, United States
Validating a Dynamic Earthquake Model to Produce Realistic Ground Motion (64995)
Dudley Joe Andrews, Organization Not Listed, Washington, DC, United States and Shuo Ma, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States
Numerical simulation analysis on Wenchuan seismic strong motion in Hanyuan region (66885)
Xueliang Chen1, Mengtan Gao2, Jinping Guo1, Zongchao Li1 and Tiefei Li1, (1)Institute of Geophysics, China Eathquake Administration, Beijing, China, (2)Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, China
Simulation of Strong Ground Motion for the 7.6Mw Kashmir Earthquake Occurred on 8 Oct 2005 (68765)
Akram Naveed and Khan Muhammad sohail, USTC University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Simulation of Strong Ground Motion in the Kanto Region during the 2011 Tohoku, Japan, Earthquake (Mw9.0) with the Pseudo Point-Source Model (77173)
Atsushi Nozu, Port and Airport Research Institute, Kanagawa, Japan and Atsushi Wakai, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Tsukuba, Japan
Validation of Broadband Ground Motion Simulations for Japanese Crustal Earthquakes by the Recipe (77696)
Asako Iwaki1, Takahiro Maeda1, Nobuyuki Morikawa2, Hiroe Miyake3 and Hiroyuki Fujiwara1, (1)National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba, Japan, (2)NIED National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba, Japan, (3)Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Integrated Simulation of Earthquake and resulting Ground Motion and Tsunami Generation for Understanding the Nankai Trough Megathrust Earthquakes (80072)
Masaru Todoriki, University of Tokyo, ERI, Bunkyo-ku, Japan, Mamoru Hyodo, JAMSTEC Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Kanagawa, Japan, Takane Hori, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan, Takashi Furumura, ERI, Univ. Tokyo, Bunkyo-Ku, Japan and Takuto Maeda, Earthquake Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
The SCEC Broadband Platform: Open-Source Software for Strong Ground Motion Simulation and Validation (80772)
Fabio Silva, Philip J Maechling, Scott Callaghan, Thomas H Jordan and Christine A. Goulet, Southern California Earthquake Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Discontinuous Staggered Finite Difference Method for Anelastic Wave Simulations (81625)
Shiying Nie1, Yongfei Wang, PhD2, Kim Bak Olsen1 and Steven M Day1, (1)San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States, (2)University of California San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, United States
Strong Ground Motion Simulation for the Mw5.9 Central Chiba Earthquake of JULY 23, 2005 with Pseudo Point-Source Model (85434)
Yosuke Nagasaka and Atsushi Nozu, Port and Airport Research Institute, Kanagawa, Japan
An Integrated Approach for the Large-Scale Simulation of Sedimentary Basins to Study Seismic Wave Amplification (86352)
Babak Poursartip, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States
A Framework for the Validation of Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis Maps Using Strong Ground Motion Data (75346)
Sam A. Bydlon, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States and Gregory C Beroza, Stanford University, Department of Geophysics, Stanford, CA, United States
Multiple Lapse Time Window Analysis Study Using Single Earthquake in the South Korea (61361)
Asep Nur Rachman and Tae-Woong Chung, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South)
A Comparison Study of the Dynamic Amplification Characteristics of the Major Domestic Seismic Observation Sites using Background Noise and S-wave Energy of Ground Motions from 15 Fukuoka Earthquakes Series (67748)
Junkyoung Kim, Semyung University, Department of fire protection engineering, Chungchongbuk-Do, South Korea and YongJeong Kwon, Heesong Geotek Co., Ltd, Daejeon, Korea, Republic of (South)
Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of rupture process application in shakemaps of Yushu Ms7.1 earthquake, China (68107)
Chen Kun, IGP Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Administration, Beijing, China
Short-impending Anomaly of GPS Observation and its Implications in Yunnan Earthquake Predication (68928)
Min Hong1, Desheng Shao1, Shuangxi Zhang2, Tengfei Wu2, Fang Wang2, Yong Zhang1, Lingli Wang1 and Xiaodong Qian1, (1)Earthquake Administration of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China, (2)Wuhan University, School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan, China
A combined method to calculate co-seismic displacements through strong motion acceleration baseline correction (69724)
Wang Zhan, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China and Yaochong Sun, USTC University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China
Sedimentary Basins: A Deeper Look at Seattle and Portland’s Earthquake Hazards (69966)
Mika Thompson, University of Washington Seattle Campus, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Seattle, United States, Arthur D Frankel, U.S. Geological Survey, Seattle, United States, Erin A Wirth, Yale University, New Haven, United States, Prof. John Emilio Vidale, University of Washington, Seattle, United States and Jiangang Han, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Seattle, WA, United States
Seismic microzoning of the city of Cayes in south-west of Haïti (72821)
Betegard Jeudy1, Mourad Karray Benhassen2 and Patrick Paultre2, (1)Laboratoire National du Bâtiment et des Travaux Publics (LNBTP), Port-au-Prince, Haiti, (2)University of Sherbrooke, civil engineering, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
Attenuation characteristics of strong ground motion from deep-focus earthquakes around the Ogasawara Islands, Japan (78407)
Hisahiko Kubo, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience, Tsukuba, Japan, Wataru Suzuki, NIED National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba, Japan, Takashi Kunugi, NIED, Tsukuba, Japan and Shin Aoi, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba, Japan
Ground Motion in Central Mexico: A Comprehensive Analysis (79044)
Leonardo Ramirez-Guzman1, Alan Juarez1, Santiago Rabade2, Jorge Aguirre3 and Jacobo Bielak4, (1)UNAM National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico, (2)University of Utah, Department of Geology & Geophysics, Salt Lake City, UT, United States, (3)Institute of Engineering UNAM, Mexico City, DF, Mexico, (4)Carnegie Mellon University, CEE, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Estimation of Source and Attenuation Parameters from Ground Motion Observations for Induced Seismicity in Alberta (81298)
Mark Novakovic and Gail Marie Atkinson, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
Discrimination of Earthquake and Blast Seismicity in Western Alberta (83867)
Andrew Law, Emrah Yenier, Neil Spriggs, Andrew Reynen and Dario Baturan, Nanometrics Inc, Kanata, ON, Canada
Physically-Based Ground Motion Prediction and Validation A Case Study: Mid-sized Marmara Sea Earthquakes (63783)
Aydin Mert, Kandilli Observatory, Istanbul, Turkey
Empirical relationships between instrumental ground motions and observed intensities for two great Chilean subduction zone earthquakes (65471)
Marcella Giovanna Cilia, University of Birmingham, Earth Sciences, Birmingham, B15, United Kingdom and Lawrence M Baker, US Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Menlo Park, CA, United States
Large Scale Site Response variation in the Central and Eastern U.S. (66311)
Rayan Yassminh, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, MO, United States, Eric A Sandvol, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States, Andrea C Conley nee Gallegos, New Mexico State University Main Campus, Las Cruces, NM, United States and Nishath Rajiv Ranasinghe, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, United States
Seismic Sources Identification and Characterization for Myanmar: Towards Updating the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Maps (2012) (66821)
Myo Thant, Myanmar Earthquake Committee, Yangon, Myanmar and Hiroshi Kawase, Kyoto University, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto, Japan
Inter- and Intra-method Variability of VS Profiles and VS30 at ARRA-funded Sites (70901)
Alan Yong, USGS California Water Science Center Menlo Park, Menlo Park, CA, United States, John Boatwright, U.S. Geological Survey, Earthquake Science Center, Menlo Park, CA, United States and Antony Jeffrey Martin, GeoVision, Inc, Corona, CA, United States
Modeling Site Amplification in Eastern North America (73645)
Sebastian Braganza, Gail Marie Atkinson, Hadi Ghofrani and Behzad Hassani, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
Liquefaction Potential for Soil Deposits in Muscat, Oman (74316)
Issa W El Hussain1, Ahmed Deif2,3, Milad Girgis3, Ghazi Al-Rawas2, Adel Mohamed2,3, Khalifa Al-Jabri2 and Zaid Al-Habsi2, (1)Sultan Qaboos University, Earthquake monitoring Center, Muscat, Oman, (2)Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman, (3)National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics, Helwan, Egypt
Near Surface Shear Wave Velocity Model of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta (75455)
Seth Shuler1, Mitchell S Craig2, Koichi Hayashi3, Jennifer Lynn Galvin4, Chai Deqiang1,4 and Morgan G Jones5, (1)California State University East Bay, Hayward, CA, United States, (2)California State Univ East Bay, Hayward, CA, United States, (3)Kyoto University, Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Uji, Japan, (4)California State University East Bay, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Hayward, CA, United States, (5)The Source Group, Inc., San Carlos, CA, United States
Application of Spectral Ratio Methods to an Investigation of Site Response in the Los Angeles Basin (76718)
Raymond Ng and Jascha Polet, California State Polytechnic University Pomona, Pomona, CA, United States
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Southern Peru and Northern Chile Segment of the Andean Subduction Zone (78089)
Mahesh Narayan Shrivastava1,2, Carlos Fuentes3, Gabriel Gonzalez3, Pablo Salazar4, Gonzalo A Yanez5, Jaun Carlos de la Llera Martin1 and Juan F. González3, (1)Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile, (2)National Research Center for Integrated Natural Disaster Management (RCINDIM/CIGIDEN), Santiago de Chile, Chile, (3)Catholic University of the North Chile, Antofagasta, Chile, (4)Organization Not Listed, Washington, DC, United States, (5)Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Deparment of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Santiago, Chile
Single-station and Small Source Regions GMPE for Site-specific PSHA (78157)
Jia Cian Gao, National Central University, Earthquake-Disaster & Risk Evaluation and Management (E-DREaM) Center, Zhongli, Taiwan and Chyi Tyi Lee, NCU National Central University of Taiwan, Jhongli, Taiwan
Development of an Empirical Local Magnitude Formula for Northern Oklahoma (79950)
Sepideh Karimi, Neil Spriggs and Andrew Owen Moores, Nanometrics Inc, Kanata, ON, Canada
Reassessing Site Effects in Idaho National Laboratory in Light of New Data (80037)
Jing Zhu1, Laurie G Baise2, Chandrakanth Bolisetti3 and Justin L Coleman3, (1)Tufts University, Medford, MA, United States, (2)Tufts University, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Medford, MA, United States, (3)Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID, United States
A Hybrid Ground-Motion Prediction Equation for Earthquakes in Western Alberta (81300)
Emrah Yenier, Andrew Law, Andrew Owen Moores and Neil Spriggs, Nanometrics Inc, Kanata, ON, Canada

See more of: Seismology