S51B-2668
Revisiting the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake in a Bayesian framework

Friday, 18 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Quentin Bletery1, Anthony Sladen1, Junle Jiang2 and Mark Simons2, (1)Univ. Nice Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, IRD, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, Géoazur, Valbonne, France, (2)Seismological Laboratory, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
Abstract:
The 2004 Mw 9.25 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake is the largest seismic event of the modern instrumental era. Despite considerable effort to analyze the characteristics of its rupture, the different available observations have proven difficult to simultaneously integrate jointly into a finite-fault slip model. In particular, the critical near-field geodetic records contain variable and significant post-seismic signal (between 2 weeks and 2 months) while the satellite altimetry records of the associated tsunami are affected by various sources of uncertainties (e.g. source rupture velocity, meso-scale oceanic currents). In this study, we investigate the quasi-static slip distribution of the Sumatra-Andaman earthquake by carefully accounting for the different sources of uncertainties in the joint inversion of an extended set of geodetic and tsunami data. To do so, we use non-diagonal covariance matrices reflecting both data and model uncertainties in a fully Bayesian inversion framework. As model errors are particularly large for mega-earthquakes, we also rely on advanced simulation codes (normal mode theory on a layered spherical Earth for the static displacement field and non-hydrostatic equations for the tsunami) and account for the 3D curvature of the megathrust interface to reduce the associated epistemic uncertainties. The fully Bayesian inversion framework then enables us to derive the families of possible models compatible with the unevenly distributed and sometimes ambiguous measurements. We find two regions of high slip at latitudes 3°-4°N and 7°-8°N with amplitudes that probably reached values as large as 40 m and possibly larger. Such amounts of slip were not proposed by previous studies, which might have been biased by smoothing regularizations. We also find significant slip (around 20 m) offshore Andaman islands absent in earlier studies. Furthermore, we find that the rupture very likely involved shallow slip, with the possibility of reaching the trench.