GC11G-1101
Quantification of physical and economic impacts of climate change on public infrastructure in Alaska and benefits of global greenhouse gas mitigation
Monday, 14 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
April M Melvin1, Peter Larsen2, Brent Boehlert3,4, Jeremy Martinich5, James Neumann3, Paul Chinowsky6, Amy Schweikert6 and Kenneth Strzepek4, (1)AAAS Science Policy Fellow hosted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, United States, (2)Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, (3)Industrial Economics, Inc., Cambridge, MA, United States, (4)Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States, (5)U.S. EPA - Climate Change Division, Washington, DC, United States, (6)Resilient Analytics, Boulder, CO, United States
Abstract:
Climate change poses many risks and challenges for the Arctic and sub-Arctic, including threats to infrastructure. The safety and stability of infrastructure in this region can be impacted by many factors including increased thawing of permafrost soils, reduced coastline protection due to declining arctic sea ice, and changes in inland flooding. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is coordinating an effort to quantify physical and economic impacts of climate change on public infrastructure across the state of Alaska and estimate how global greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation may avoid or reduce these impacts. This research builds on the Climate Change Impacts and Risk Analysis (CIRA) project developed for the contiguous U.S., which is described in an EPA report released in June 2015. We are using a multi-model analysis focused primarily on the impacts of changing permafrost, coastal erosion, and inland flooding on a range of infrastructure types, including transportation (e.g. roads, airports), buildings and harbors, energy sources and transmission, sewer and water systems, and others. This analysis considers multiple global GHG emission scenarios ranging from a business as usual future to significant global action. These scenarios drive climate projections through 2100 spanning a range of outcomes to capture variability amongst climate models. Projections are being combined with a recently developed public infrastructure database and integrated into a version of the Infrastructure Planning Support System (IPSS) we are modifying for use in the Arctic and sub-Arctic region. The IPSS tool allows for consideration of both adaptation and reactive responses to climate change. Results of this work will address a gap in our understanding of climate change impacts in Alaska, provide estimates of the physical and economic damages we may expect with and without global GHG mitigation, and produce important insights about infrastructure vulnerabilities in response to warming at northern latitudes.
