ED11F-02
Disturbing Information and Denial in the Classroom and Beyond: Climate Change, Emotions and Everyday Life

Monday, 14 December 2015: 08:15
303 (Moscone South)
Kari Marie Norgaard, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, United States
Abstract:
Global warming is the most significant environmental issue of our time, yet public response in Western nations has been meager. Why have so few taken any action?

Most studies of public response to climate change have focused on information deficit approaches. Many in the general public and environmental community have presumed that the public’s failure to engage is a function of lack of concern about climate change. Instead, using interviews and ethnographic research on how knowledge of climate change is experienced in everyday life I describe “the social organization of climate denial” and discuss how it impacts classroom learning and the broader social understanding of climate change. Disturbing emotions of guilt, helplessness and fear of the future arose when people were confronted with the idea of climate change. People then normalized these disturbing emotions by changing the subject of conversations, shifting their attention elsewhere, telling jokes, and drawing on stock social discourses that deflected responsibility to others. The difficulty people have in making sense of climate change is in direct relation to the social world around them. This research suggests that educational strategies in the classroom and for the general public that consider and target the social, cultural and political aspects of the meaning of climate change will be most effective (in addition to factors that affect individual cognition).