GP31A-1384
100 M.a. remagnetization as a dating tool for deformation and cleavage in the Central High Atlas (Morocco)

Wednesday, 16 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Pablo Calvin1, Antonio MarĂ­a Casas2, Juan Jose Villalain1 and Bennacer Moussaid3, (1)University of Burgos, Burgos, Spain, (2)University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, (3)Casablanca University, Casablanca, Morocco
Abstract:
The High Atlas is an intracontinental chain developed as a result of the inversion of Mesozoic basins during the Cenozoic. Its structure is characterized by ENE-WSW tight anticlines limited by wide synclines. In the central sector of the chain, a pervasive tectonic foliation affects Jurassic limestones and marls. There is a controversy about the age of this tectonic foliation and its relationship with either a Late Jurassic or Cenozoic compressional events.

The Jurassic carbonates of the Central High Atlas (CHA) show a widespread syntectonic remagnetization carried by magnetite and dated at 100 M.a. by comparing the paleomagnetic direction obtained by small circle intersection (SCI) method with the apparent polar wander path in NW Africa coordinates.

Once the 100 M.a. paleomagnetic direction is known, the obtained paleomagnetic direction remagnetization in each site can be used to restore the bedding at the time of the acquisition. In each site, the in situ mean direction of remagnetization defines a small circle (SC) in a complete rotation about the strike of the bedding. This SC gives all possible original directions of the magnetization and if all deformation events are coaxial and without vertical rotation (as it is the case in the study area) all the SC contains the 100 M.a. expected direction. Then, the angle between the 100 M.a. and the in situ paleomagnetic direction along the small circle, equals the angle of rotation of each bed to ultimately find their dips (paleodip) at 100 M.a.

Since the consistency between folding and cleavage can be examined from their geometrical relationship, and bedding can be restored to its 100 M.a. geometry (paleodips obtained from paleomagnetic analysis), two end-members exist for the different examined folds: (i) cleavage is consistent with present-day bedding orientation and attitude of bedding was acquired after remagnetization (Cenozoic cleavage), (ii) cleavage is consistent with bedding, but dip of bedding was acquired during the pre-remagnetization stage, as inferred from paleomagnetic analysis (Mesozoic cleavage). Intermediate possibilities, having cleavage developed during one of the two stages with intermediate dips between present-day orientation and the horizontal, are also possible, and are analyzed in different examples of the Atlas chain.