PA13A-2184
Quantifying the Value of Downscaled Climate Model Information for Adaptation Decisions: When is Downscaling a Smart Decision?

Monday, 14 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Adam J Terando1, Adrienne Wootten2, Mitchell J Eaton1, Michael C Runge3, Jeremy S Littell4, Alexander M Bryan5 and Shawn L Carter6, (1)US Geological Survey, Southeast Climate Science Center, Raleigh, NC, United States, (2)North Carolina State University Raleigh, Raleigh, NC, United States, (3)US Geological Survey, Patuxent Wildlife Research Center, Laurel, MD, United States, (4)USGS Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, AK, United States, (5)US Geological Survey, Northeast Climate Science Center, Amherst, MA, United States, (6)US Geological Survey, Reston, VA, United States
Abstract:
Two types of decisions face society with respect to anthropogenic climate change: (1) whether to enact a global greenhouse gas abatement policy, and (2) how to adapt to the local consequences of current and future climatic changes. The practice of downscaling global climate models (GCMs) is often used to address (2) because GCMs do not resolve key features that will mediate global climate change at the local scale. In response, the development of downscaling techniques and models has accelerated to aid decision makers seeking adaptation guidance. However, quantifiable estimates of the value of information are difficult to obtain, particularly in decision contexts characterized by deep uncertainty and low system-controllability. Here we demonstrate a method to quantify the additional value that decision makers could expect if research investments are directed towards developing new downscaled climate projections. As a proof of concept we focus on a real-world management problem: whether to undertake assisted migration for an endangered tropical avian species. We also take advantage of recently published multivariate methods that account for three vexing issues in climate impacts modeling: maximizing climate model quality information, accounting for model dependence in ensembles of opportunity, and deriving probabilistic projections. We expand on these global methods by including regional (Caribbean Basin) and local (Puerto Rico) domains. In the local domain, we test whether a high resolution (2km) dynamically downscaled GCM reduces the multivariate error estimate compared to the original coarse-scale GCM. Initial tests show little difference between the downscaled and original GCM multivariate error. When propagated through to a species population model, the Value of Information analysis indicates that the expected utility that would accrue to the manager (and species) if this downscaling were completed may not justify the cost compared to alternative actions.