A11M-0232
Effects of After-Treatment Control Technologies on Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Emissions

Monday, 14 December 2015
Poster Hall (Moscone South)
Chelsea Preble1, Timothy R Dallmann2, Nathan M Kreisberg3, Susanne V Hering3, Robert Harley4 and Thomas Kirchstetter5, (1)University of California Berkeley, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Berkeley, CA, United States, (2)Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, United States, (3)Aerosol Dynamics Inc., Berkeley, CA, United States, (4)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, (5)UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
Abstract:
Diesel engines are major emitters of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and the black carbon (BC) fraction of particulate matter (PM). Diesel particle filter (DPF) and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) emission control systems that target exhaust PM and NOx have recently become standard on new heavy-duty diesel trucks (HDDT). There is concern that DPFs may increase ultrafine particle (UFP) and total particle number (PN) emissions while reducing PM mass emissions. Also, the deliberate catalytic oxidation of engine-out NO to NO2 in continuously regenerating DPFs may lead to increased tailpipe emission of NO2 and near-roadway concentrations that exceed the 1-hr national ambient air quality standard. Increased NO2 emissions can also promote formation of ozone and secondary PM.

We report results from ongoing on-road studies of HDDT emissions at the Port of Oakland and the Caldecott Tunnel in California’s San Francisco Bay Area. Emission factors (g pollutant per kg diesel) were linked via recorded license plates to each truck’s engine model year and installed emission controls. At both sites, DPF use significantly increased the NO2/NOx emission ratio. DPFs also significantly increased NO2 emissions when installed as retrofits on older trucks with higher baseline NOx emissions. While SCR systems on new trucks effectively reduce total NOx emissions and mitigate these undesirable DPF-related NO2 emissions, they also lead to significant emission of N2O, a potent greenhouse gas. When expressed on a CO2-equivalent basis, the N2O emissions increase offsets the fuel economy gain (i.e., the CO2 emission reduction) associated with SCR use.

At the Port, average NOx, BC and PN emission factors from new trucks equipped with DPF and SCR were 69 ± 15%, 92 ± 32% and 66 ± 35% lower, respectively, than modern trucks without these emission controls. In contrast, at the Tunnel, PN emissions from older trucks retrofit with DPFs were ~2 times greater than modern trucks without DPFs. The difference could be related to engine temperature, with highway operation producing greater exhaust temperatures that promote UFP nucleation.

These studies indicate that DPF and SCR use can mitigate air quality and climate impacts of diesel truck emissions through reductions in BC and NOx. However, increased emissions of N2O, NO2 and PN may offset some of the benefits.