S33E:
New Frontiers in Global Seismic Monitoring and Earthquake Research Posters


Submit an Abstract to this Session


Session ID#: 50028

Session Description:
The past decade has seen improvements in computational efficiency, seismic data coverage, and communication technology driven by societal expectation for timely, accurate information. While aspects of earthquake research have taken advantage of this evolution, the adoption of improvements in earthquake monitoring has not been fully leveraged. In real-time monitoring, earthquakes are characterized in a vacuum, without knowledge of past events. New data types may help characterize earthquakes more quickly and accurately. New opportunities exist for rapid communication. With these advances, global seismic monitoring can improve the quality and timeliness of information shared with the public. We solicit contributions that tackle these issues, including new approaches to earthquake detection, location, source characterization, and impact assessment. We seek to identify priorities of future monitoring efforts, what new technologies can improve the speed and accuracy of monitoring, and how to improve communication and coordination between groups involved in earthquake response and research.
Primary Convener:  Gavin P Hayes, USGS National Earthquake Information Center, Golden, CO, United States
Conveners:  Paul S Earle1, David J Wald2 and William L Yeck1, (1)USGS National Earthquake Information Center, Golden, United States(2)USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, United States
Primary Liaison:  Gavin P Hayes, USGS National Earthquake Information Center, Golden, CO, United States
Chairs:  Gavin P Hayes, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, United States and William L Yeck, United States Geological Survey, Golden, United States
OSPA Liaison:  William L Yeck, United States Geological Survey, Golden, United States

Cross-Listed:
  • G - Geodesy
  • NH - Natural Hazards
  • T - Tectonophysics
Index Terms:

4315 Monitoring, forecasting, prediction [NATURAL HAZARDS]
7215 Earthquake source observations [SEISMOLOGY]
7219 Seismic monitoring and test-ban treaty verification [SEISMOLOGY]
7294 Seismic instruments and networks [SEISMOLOGY]

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Outcomes of the first meeting of the Powell Center Working Group for Earthquake Monitoring (447224)
Gavin P Hayes1, Paul S Earle2, Harley Benz3, David J Wald4, William Yeck3 and David R Shelly5, (1)USGS National Earthquake Information Center Golden, Golden, CO, United States, (2)USGS National Earthquake Information Center, Golden, United States, (3)USGS National Earthquake Information Center, Golden, CO, United States, (4)USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, United States, (5)U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, United States
The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability version 2.0 (CSEP2.0): New Developments in Earthquake Forecasting and Testing Capabilities (466251)
William H Savran1, Philip J Maechling1, Maximilian J Werner2, Thomas H Jordan1, Danijel Schorlemmer3, David Alan Rhoades4, Warner Marzocchi5, John Yu6 and Prof. John Emilio Vidale1, (1)Southern California Earthquake Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States, (2)University of Bristol, School of Earth Sciences and Cabot Institute, Bristol, BS8, United Kingdom, (3)GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (4)GNS Science-Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Ltd, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, (5)University of Naples Federico II, Department of Earth, Environmental, and Resources Sciences, Naples, Italy, (6)University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Real-time operational aftershock forecasting in Japan (388079)
Takahiro Omi1, Yosihiko Ogata2, Katsuhiko Shiomi3, Bogdan Enescu4, Kaoru Sawazaki5 and Kazuyuki Aihara1, (1)Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, (2)Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Tokyo, Japan, (3)NIED National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba, Japan, (4)Kyoto University, Department of Geophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto, Japan, (5)NIED, Tsukuba, Japan
Assessment of Earthquake Early Warning Methods for Complex Fault Ruptures (373843)
Emrah Yenier, Mark Novakovic and Neil Spriggs, Nanometrics Inc, Kanata, ON, Canada
Global prevalence of M4+ earthquakes at volcanoes and their potential use in eruption forecasting (398367)
Jeremy D Pesicek and Sarah E Ogburn, USGS Cascades Volcano Observatory, Vancouver, WA, United States
The Earthquake Rates They Are a-Changin’: Improving Forecasts During Earthquake Swarms (397826)
Andrea L Llenos1, Andrew Jay Michael2, Morgan T Page3, Nicholas van der Elst4 and Sara McBride1, (1)USGS, Menlo Park, CA, United States, (2)USGS, Earthquake Science Center, Moffett Field, United States, (3)USGS, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)USGS, Pasadena, United States
Near real-time estimates on earthquake rupture directivity using near-field ground motion data from a dense low-cost seismic network (377529)
Jyh Cherng Jan1, Hsin-Hua Huang2, Yih-Min Wu2, Chien-Chih Chen3 and Cheng-Horng Lin4, (1)Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, Sanchong District, Taiwan, (2)Academia Sinica, Institute of Earth Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan, (3)Department of Earth Sciences, National Central University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, (4)Taiwan Volcano Observatory at Tatun, Taipei, Taiwan
The USGS National Earthquake Information Center’s Future Research and Operational Developments (442019)
Paul S Earle1, Gavin P Hayes2, William L Yeck1, David R Shelly3, Harley Benz4 and David J Wald5, (1)USGS National Earthquake Information Center, Golden, United States, (2)USGS National Earthquake Information Center Golden, Golden, CO, United States, (3)U.S. Geological Survey, Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, United States, (4)USGS National Earthquake Information Center, Golden, CO, United States, (5)USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, United States
Incorporating added value event detection data in the NEIC’s real-time associator (413715)
William L Yeck1, John Patton1, Harley Benz2, Paul S Earle1 and Michelle R Guy3, (1)USGS National Earthquake Information Center, Golden, United States, (2)USGS National Earthquake Information Center, Golden, CO, United States, (3)USGS National Earthquake Information Center Golden, Golden, CO, United States
Classification Strategies Applied to Event Nucleation and Phase Association (438114)
Ben Baker1, Paul A Friberg2 and Josh Stachnik1, (1)Instrumental Software Technologies, Inc., Saratoga Springs, NY, United States, (2)Instrumental Software Technologies, Inc., Saratoga Springs, United States
Advanced Ground Motion Characterization in ShakeMap Modeling Energy-Related Ground Motion Parameters (442490)
Tara Nye1,2, Kate Allstadt1, Eric M Thompson3 and C. Bruce Worden4, (1)USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, CO, United States, (2)Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology, Washington D.C., DC, United States, (3)USGS, Golden, CO, United States, (4)USGS Geologic Hazards Science Center, Golden, United States
The InSight Marsquake service: Procedures and results of Operational Readiness Test (448073)
Savas Ceylan1, Simon C Staehler1, John F Clinton2, Martin van Driel3, Maren Boese3, Fabian Euchner4, Amir Khan5, Domenico Giardini3, Mark P Panning6, Raphael Garcia7, Philippe Henri Lognonné8, William Bruce Banerdt9 and InSight Marsquake Service Team, (1)ETH Zurich, Institute of Geophysics, Zurich, Switzerland, (2)ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Swiss Seismological Service (SED), Zurich, Switzerland, (3)ETH Zurich, Department of Earth Sciences, Institute of Geophysics, Zurich, Switzerland, (4)ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, (5)ETH Zurich, Department of Earth Sciences, Institute of Geochemistry and Petrology, Zurich, Switzerland, (6)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States, (7)Institut Supérieur de l'Aéronautique et de l'Espace, DEOS/SSPA, Toulouse Cedex 04, France, (8)Université Paris Cité, Institut de physique du globe de Paris, CNRS, Paris, France, (9)JPL/NASA/Caltech, Pasadena, United States
On the Source Characteristics of Inter and Intraplate Earthquakes in the Japanese Trench: A Joint Study of Teleseismic Waveform Models and Strong Motion Spectrograms (363782)
Avigyan Chatterjee, IISER Kolkata, Department of Earth Sciences, Asansol, India, Thulasiraman Natarajan, Indian Institute of Science, Center for Earth Sciences, Bangalore, India and Kusala Rajendran, Indian Institute of Science, Centre for Earth Sciences, Bangalore, India
Discriminating Depth Phases from Earthquake Energy for Automated Real-time Assessment (378797)
Louisa Barama, Georgia Institute of Technology, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Atlanta, United States and Andrew Vern Newman, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, United States
The ANCorr Method: An Algorithm for Synthesizing ANCorr Templates (396867)
Tyler Ganter1, Amy Sundermier2 and Sanford Ballard1, (1)Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, United States, (2)Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, United States
Exploring prompt gravity signals during the 2004 M9.0 Sumatra and 2010 M8.8 Maule earthquakes (400485)
Xinyu Jiang, ITAG Institute of Theoretical and Applied Geophysics, Peking University, Beijing, China and Lingsen Meng, University of California Los Angeles, Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, Los Angeles, United States
Full waveform constraints on global earthquake depths to compliment the ISC bulletin (406827)
Thomas Garth, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, Karin Sigloch, University of Oxford, Department of Earth Sciences, Oxford, United Kingdom and Dmitry A Storchak, International Seismological Centre (ISC), Thatcham, United Kingdom
Depth determination for moderate-magnitude earthquakes using a stacked global seismic array (411347)
Timothy J Craig, University of Leeds, COMET, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, United Kingdom
Earthquake focal mechanism determination from the initial P-wave amplitude distribution for real-time applications (377365)
Simona Colombelli, The University of Naples Federico II, Physics, Naples, Italy, Antonio Emolo, The University of Naples Federico II, Physics Ettore Pancini, Naples, Italy, Stefania Tarantino, The University of Naples Federico II, Department of Physics, Naples, Italy and Aldo Zollo, University of Naples Federico II, Department of Physics, Naples, Italy
Development of an automatic analysis algorithm for dense temporary seismic network and its application to the 2016 ML 5.8 Gyeongju earthquake sequence, Korea (427581)
Minook KIM1, Tae-Seob Kang1, Hyun Jae Yoo2, Junkee Rhie3, Younghee Kim4, Kwang-Hee Kim5 and Yongcheol Park6, (1)Pukyong National University, Division of Earth Environmental System Science, Busan, South Korea, (2)Pukyong National University, Busan 48513, South Korea, (3)Seoul National University, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul, South Korea, (4)Seoul National University, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul, Korea, Republic of (South), (5)Pusan National University, Department of Geological Science, Busan, Korea, Republic of (South), (6)Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon, South Korea

See more of: Seismology