G21A:
Geodetic Imaging and Interpretation of the Seismic Cycle I


Submit an Abstract to this Session


Session ID#: 57897

Session Description:
Geodesy’s ability to image earth processes has vastly improved both spatially and temporally in recent decades, making it an essential tool to study the seismic cycle and the ways the earth accommodates tectonic strain. To use geodesy to image these processes in a complex earth, it is essential to 1) correctly separate the contributions made by seismic, aseismic and nontectonic deformation in the data, and then 2) link these observations to fault and bulk processes with a full view of their spatiotemporal complexities. We welcome studies on all aspects of geodetic imaging of the seismic cycle: from improved techniques to detect tectonic signals (e.g. probabilistic, sparsity-promoting, etc.) and separate them from other deformation sources (e.g. hydrological, thermoelastic, anthropogenic), to the modeling and interpretation of the deformation mechanisms that produce them (e.g. coseismic slip, afterslip, viscoelastic relaxation, poroelastic rebound, slow slip events, long-term creep, gravity-driven postseismic deformation).
Primary Convener:  Chris Rollins, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States
Conveners:  Adriano Gualandi, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States; California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States and Mong-Han Huang, University of Maryland College Park, College Park, MD, United States
Primary Liaison:  Chris Rollins, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States
Chairs:  Chris Rollins, GNS Science, Earthquake Physics and Statistics, Lower Hutt, New Zealand and Adriano Gualandi, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States; NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States
OSPA Liaison:  Chris Rollins, GNS Science, Earthquake Physics and Statistics, Lower Hutt, New Zealand

Cross-Listed:
  • T - Tectonophysics
Index Terms:

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Sigrun Hreinsdottir1, Ian J Hamling1, Laura M Wallace1,2, Paul H Denys3, Susan M Ellis1, Neville Palmer1, Elisabetta D'Anastasio4, Paula Gentle5, Chris Ferens Pearson3 and Phaedra Upton1, (1)GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand, (2)University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Geophysics, Austin, United States, (3)University of Otago, National School of Surveying, Dunedin, New Zealand, (4)GNS Science Te Pῡ Ao, Wellington, New Zealand, (5)Land Information New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
Luca Dal Zilio, ETH Zürich, Institute of Geophysics, Department of Earth Sciences, Switzerland, Zurich, Switzerland, Romain Jolivet, École Normale Supérieure, PSL Research University, UMR 8538, Laboratoire de Géologie, Paris, France and Ylona van Dinther, Utrecht University, Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands
Leah Langer, Princeton University, Geosciences, Princeton, NJ, United States, Théa Ragon, Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States, Anthony Sladen, Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Géoazur, Valbonne, France and Jeroen Tromp, Princeton University, Department of Geosciences, Princeton, NJ, United States
Ruth Amey, University of Leeds, COMET, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, LS2, United Kingdom, Andrew J Hooper, University of Leeds, COMET, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, United Kingdom, Richard J Walters, COMET, Durham University, Department of Earth Sciences, Durham, United Kingdom and Yu Morishita, Geography and Crustal Dynamics Research Center, Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, Tsukuba, Japan
Kaj M Johnson, Indiana University Bloomington, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Bloomington, IN, United States

See more of: Geodesy