Carbon isotope signature of CH4 and CO2 as a tool to unravel diagenetic pathways in lake sediments

French Title: La signature isotopique du carbone dans le CH4 et le CO2 comme outil pour clarifier les voies diagénétiques dans les sédiments lacustres

Francois Clayer1,2, Anja Moritz2,3, Yves Gelinas2,4, André Tessier1 and Charles Gobeil2,5, (1)Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique-Eau Terre Environnement INRS-ETE, Quebec City, QC, Canada, (2)GEOTOP, Montreal, QC, Canada, (3)Concordia University, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montréal, QC, Canada, (4)Concordia University, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montreal, QC, Canada, (5)Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Eau Terre Environnement, Quebec City, QC, Canada

Contact First Author: Francois Clayer; francois.clayer@ete.inrs.ca

Previously Published Material: A part of these findings were reported at the 17th Annual Chemistry and Biochemistry Graduate Research Conference at Concordia University, Montréal.

Abstract ID#: 35481

 

English Abstract:
In aquatic sediments, methane (CH4), a potent greenhouse gas, is produced through the microbial breakdown of organic matter (OM) once sulfate is depleted, and can be consumed by aerobic and anaerobic oxidation (methanotrophy). It is well known that methanotrophy as well as methanogenesis, i.e. acetate fermentation (acetoclasty) and CO2 reduction with H2 (hydrogenotrophy), are processes that modify the carbon isotopic composition (δ13C) of CH4 and CO2 contained in the sediments. To unravel methane diagenetic pathways in the sediments of an oligotrophic and seasonally anoxic Canadian Shield lake, we determined high-resolution vertical profiles of dissolved CH4 and CO2, as well as their δ13C. The concentration profiles of CH4 and CO2 were modeled, using a one-dimensional transport-reaction equation, to constrain the depth-intervals (zones) where these species are produced or consumed in the first 25 cm of the sedimentary column, and to estimate their net production/consumption rates in each of the zones. The comparison of CH4 and CO2 net reaction rates enables us to constrain, in each zone, rates for acetoclasty, hydrogenotrophy, methanotrophy and OM fermentation. Then, fitting the measured δ13C profiles with those simulated by a steady-state transport-reaction model allows us to clarify the relative contribution of acetoclasty and hydrogenotrophy. The model takes into account the constrained rates and established isotope fractionation factors reported in the literature for all the above-mentioned processes. We conclude that nearly 100% of CH4 was produced by hydrogenotrophy following the non-fractionating fermentation of humic substances to CO2 and H2.