Using Expert Elicitation to Estimate the Impacts of Plastic Pollution on Marine Wildlife

Nicholas James Mallos1, Chris Wilcox2, George H Leonard1, Alba G Rodriquez1 and Britta Denise Hardesty2, (1)Ocean Conservancy, Trash Free Seas Program, Washington, DC, United States, (2)CSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere Business Unit, Hobart, Australia
Abstract:
With the rapid increase in global plastics production and the resulting large volume of litter that enters the marine environment, determining the consequences of this debris on marine fauna and ocean health has now become a critical environmental priority, particularly for threatened and endangered species. However, there are limited data about the impacts on debris on marine species from which to draw conclusions about the population consequences of anthropogenic debris. To address this knowledge gap, information was elicited from experts on the ecological threat of entanglement, ingestion and chemical contamination for three major marine taxa: seabirds, sea turtles and marine mammals. The threat assessment focused on the most common types of litter that are found along the world's coastlines, based on data gathered during three decades of international coastal clean-up efforts. Fishing related gear, balloons and plastic bags were estimated to pose the greatest entanglement risk to marine fauna. In contrast, experts identified a broader suite of items of concern for ingestion, with plastic bags and plastic utensils ranked as the greatest threats. Entanglement and ingestion affected a similar range of taxa, although entanglement was slightly worse as it is more likely to be lethal. Contamination was scored the lowest in terms of its impact, affecting a smaller portion of the taxa and being rated as having solely non-lethal impacts.

Research designed to better understand and quantify the impacts of chemical contamination on marine fauna at individual, population and species levels should be a priority for conservation biologists. This work points towards a number of opportunities for both policy-based and consumer-driven changes in plastics use that could have demonstrable affects for a range of taxa that are ecologically important and serve as indicators of marine ecosystem health. Based on threat rankings, entanglement and ingestion should be a similar priority for management action, as experts ranked them nearly identically in terms of expected population impacts. Fishing gear, plastic bags, and plastic utensils were all ranked as having substantial impacts on more than half of all three marine taxa, and should be priorities for management action.