Composition and extracellular enzymatic function of pelagic, particle-associated, and benthic bacterial communities in the central Arctic Ocean

John Paul Balmonte, Andreas Teske and Carol Arnosti, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Marine Sciences, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
Abstract:
The structure and function of Arctic bacterial communities have rarely been studied in concert, but are crucial to our understanding of biogeochemical cycles. As the Arctic transitions to become seasonally-ice free, a critical priority is to elucidate the present ecological role and environmental dependence of Arctic bacterial communities. We investigated the depth and regional variations in Central Arctic bacterial community composition (BCC) and extracellular enzymatic activities (EEA)—the initial step in organic matter breakdown—to explore links between community structure and function. Samples were collected across a gradient of sea-ice cover (open ocean, first year ice, multi-year ice) from 79°N to 88°N and from surface to bottom waters (~3.5 to 4.5 km). Pelagic BCC most strongly varies with hydrography and with particle-association, which likely selects for a specialized community of heterotrophic opportunists; benthic BCC show little regional variation. In contrast, EEA reveal significant depth and regional differences in hydrolysis rates as well as in the spectrum of substrates hydrolyzed. Particle-associated EEA reveal an equal or greater range of enzymatic capabilities than in bulk-seawater measurements, supporting previous findings that particles are hotspots of microbial heterotrophic activity. These patterns suggest a complex relationship between BCC, EEA, and the environment: while water mass characteristics consistently differentiate bacterial communities, additional local factors shape their capabilities to hydrolyze organic matter. Multivariate analyses will be used to further explore the relationships between composition and function as well as their correlations with environmental data. Our findings provide a baseline for future comparisons and initial insight into the functionality and biogeography of Arctic bacterial communities.