Mobile, stationary and mixed phase tracers: consequences to sea ice biogeochemistry
Nicole Jeffery1, Scott Elliott1, Elizabeth Clare Hunke2, Clara Deal3 and Meibing Jin3, (1)Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, United States, (2)Los Alamos National Laboratory, T-3 Fluid Dynamics and Solid Mechanics Group, Los Alamos, NM, United States, (3)University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States
Abstract:
Models of brine motion in sea ice have offered mechanisms for transporting biogeochemical compounds vertically within the ice and between the ice-ocean interface. In these models, sea ice microstructure and/or gross physical properties determine the resupply of nitrate, for example, to sympagic algae and that resupply, in large part, constrains sea ice primary production. The assumption of brine transport models is that the transported matter exists in a purely mobile phase within the ice brine channels. As a result, non-reacting, mobile phase tracers evolve like salinity in dynamic sea ice. Field and laboratory observations indicate that this is a good approximation for the primary algal macronutrients – nitrate, silicate and phosphate, but clear deviations are evident for ammonium, micronutrients such as iron, humic substances, algal bi-products such as gels and extracellular polysaccharides, and the algae themselves. This wide range of biogeochemical matter resists brine motion and is present in both the mobile and stationary phases, i.e. these tracers are “mixed” with respect to their transport phases. Although the precise mechanism for this resistance may be due to attachment by frustules, “stickiness” of the material surface, adsorption, or, in the case of microorganisms, active motility, a key common element in all cases is the presence of the ice matrix. In this presentation we investigate the consequences of mixed phase tracers in sea ice on algal concentrations, vertical distributions, and the potential accumulation of biogeochemical matter within the ice. We assume that sea ice growth promotes retention to the stationary phase, while melt and the disintegration of the ice matrix promotes release into the mobile phase. By varying the retention and release timescales of this formulation, we retrieve the purely mobile and maximal accumulation limits.
