Trophic Interactions in Louisiana Salt Marshes: Combining Stomach Content, Stable Isotope, and Fatty Acid Approaches

Paola C. Lopez-Duarte1, Kenneth Able1, Joel Fodrie2, Michael J McCann3, Stephanie Melara4, Carola Noji4, Jill Olin5, Jennifer Pincin4, Katie Plank6, Michael J Polito7 and Olaf Jensen8, (1)Rutgers University Marine Field Station, Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Tuckerton, NJ, United States, (2)University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Institute of Marine Sciences, Morehead City, NC, United States, (3)The Nature Conservancy, New York, NY, United States, (4)Rutgers University, (5)Michigan Technological University, Great Lakes Research Center, Houghton, United States, (6)University of Tennessee, Knoxville, (7)Louisiana State University, Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Baton Rouge, LA, United States, (8)Rutgers University, Department of Marine & Coastal Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
Abstract:
Multiple studies conducted over five years since the 2010 Macondo oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico indicate that oil impacts vary widely among taxonomic groups. For instance, fishes inhabiting the marsh surface show no clear differences in either community composition or population characteristics between oiled and unoiled sites, despite clear evidence of physiological impacts on individual fish. In contrast, marsh insects and spiders are sensitive to the effects of hydrocarbons. Both insects and spiders are components of the marsh food web and represent an important trophic link between marsh plants and higher trophic levels. Because differences in oil impacts throughout the marsh food web have the potential to significantly alter food webs and energy flow pathways and reduce food web resilience, our goal is to quantify differences in marsh food webs between oiled and unoiled sites to test the hypothesis that oiling has resulted in simpler and less resilient food webs. Diets and food web connections were quantified through a combination of stomach content, stable isotope, and fatty acid analysis. The combination of these three techniques provides a more robust approach to quantifying trophic relationships than any of these methods alone. Stomach content analysis provides a detailed snapshot of diets, while fatty acid and stable isotopes reflect diets averaged over weeks to months. Initial results focus on samples collected in May 2015 from a range of terrestrial and aquatic consumer species, including insects, mollusks, crustaceans, and piscivorous fishes.