First Step Towards a Coastal Modelling System for South Africa: a St. Helena Bay Case Study

Charine Collins1, Tarron Lamont2, Ben R Loveday3, Juliet Clair Hermes4, Jennifer Anne Veitch4 and Bjorn Backeberg5, (1)South African Environmental Observation Network, South Africa, (2)Department of Environmental Affairs, Oceans & Coasts Research Branch, Cape Town 8012, South Africa, (3)Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Remote Sensing Group, Plymouth, United Kingdom, (4)South African Environmental Observation Network (SAEON), Cape Town, South Africa, (5)Nansen Tutu Centre for Marine Environmental Research, Cape Town, South Africa
Abstract:
St. Helena Bay, forming part of the southern Benguela ecosystem, is the largest bay on the west coast of South Africa and is a biologically important region for pelagic fish, hake, and rock lobster. To date, only a few infrequent studies have focussed on variations in the bay scale circulation. A monthly ship-based monitoring line, the St. Helena Bay Monitoring Line (SHBML), was initiated in 2000 to determine the seasonal changes in cross-shelf hydrography and biology.

Even though there has been an increase in ocean modelling in and around South Africa in recent years, coastal modelling is still in its infancy. The 12-year observational data set in the St. Helena Bay region, the only long-term, cross-shelf, full water column data-set for South Africa, makes this area the perfect natural laboratory for the development of a coastal modelling system. In this study, the climatological mean temperature and salinity from three different ROMS simulations and a HYCOM simulation are evaluated against the in situ observations from the SHBML with the aim of determining the influence of different forcing products, horizontal and vertical resolution as well as vertical coordinate schemes on the vertical structure of the ocean. The model simulations tend to overestimate the temperature and salinity across the shelf, and particularly within St. Helena Bay. Furthermore, the models misrepresent the vertical salinity and temperature structures. Interestingly, below 800m, there is a better agreement between temperature in the models and the in-situ observations. This is the first detailed comparison of modelled and in-situ data for the greater St. Helena Bay area at this scale and the next phase will examine whether the model that is most congruent with the observations resolves the same interannual signals as observed in the in-situ data.