Variance in Dominant Grain Size Across the Mississippi River Delta

Kimberly Litwin Miller, University of Wyoming, Department of Geology, Laramie, WY, United States, Elizabeth L Chamberlain, Vanderbilt University, Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Nashville, TN, United States, Christopher R Esposito, Tulane University of Louisiana, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, New Orleans, LA, United States, Wayne Wagner, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States and David C Mohrig, University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geological Sciences, Austin, TX, United States
Abstract:
Proposals to restore coastal Louisiana often center on Mississippi River diversion projects wherein water and sediment are routed into wetlands and shallow waters in an effort to build land. Successful design and implementation of diversions will include consideration of behavior and characteristics of sediment, both in the river and in the receiving basin. The Mississippi River sediment load is primarily mud (roughly 75%), with the remainder being very-fine to medium sand or organic detritus. The dominance of muds leads many to suggest that diversions should focus on capturing the mud fraction despite the smaller size and longer settling times required for these particles compared to sand; others believe that sand should be the focus.
We present a systemic analysis of the texture of land-building sediment in the Mississippi Delta using borehole data from various depositional environments representing a range of spatial scales, system ages, and fluvial and basin characteristics. We include subdelta-scale data from the incipient Wax Lake Delta and from the distal plain of the abandoned Lafourche subdelta, as well as crevasse-scale data from modern Cubit's Gap and the Attakapas splay, an inland Lafourche crevasse. Comparison of these sites demonstrates a large variance in the volumetric mud to sand ratios across the system. We consider the differences to be emblematic of the various forcings on each lobe as it formed and suggest that the most efficient building block for a diversion is a function of the receiving basin and is not uniform across the entire delta.