Evaluation of Bio-optical Models for Discriminating Phytoplankton Functional Types and Size Classes in Eastern U.S. Coastal Waters with Approaches to Remote Sensing Applications

Aimee Renee Neeley, University of Maryland College Park; NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Joaquim I Goes, Lamont -Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY, United States, Christy Alex Jenkins, Columbia University, Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New York, NY, United States and Lora Harris, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Solomons, MD, United States
Abstract:
Phytoplankton species can be separated into phytoplankton functional types (PFTs) or size classes (PSCs; Micro-, Nano-, and Picoplankton). Bio-optical models have been developed to use satellite-derived products to discriminate PSCs and PFTs, a recommended field measurement for the future NASA PACE mission. The proposed 5 nm spectral resolution of the PACE ocean color sensor will improve detection of PSCs and PFTs by discriminating finer optical features not detected at the spectral resolution of current satellite-borne instruments. In preparation for PACE, new and advanced models are under development that require accurate data for validation.

Phytoplankton pigment data have long been collected from aquatic environments and are widely used to model PSC and PFT abundances using two well-known methods: Diagnostic Pigment Analysis (DPA) and Chemical Taxonomy (ChemTax), respectively. Here we present the results of an effort to evaluate five bio-optical PFT models using data from a field campaign off the coast of the Eastern U.S. in November 2014: two based on biomass (Chlorophyll a), two based on light absorption properties of phytoplankton and one based the inversion of remote sensing reflectances. PFT model performance is evaluated using phytoplankton taxonomic data from a FlowCam sensor and DPA and ChemTax analyses using pigment data collected during the field campaign in a variety of water types and optical complexities (e.g., coastal, blue water, eddies and fronts). Relative strengths of the model approaches will be presented as a model validation exercise using both in situ and satellite derived input products.