Loss for Gain? The Potential Importance Of Marsh Creekbank Erosion For Marsh Platform Survival

Charles Hopkinson, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States, James T Morris, University of South Carolina, Baruch Institute, Columbia, SC, United States, Peter A Raymond, Yale University, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT, United States and Sergio Fagherazzi, Boston University, Earth and Environment, Boston, MA, United States
Abstract:
We have been measuring watershed inputs and the along-estuary distribution of suspended sediments for over 20 yrs in the Plum Island Estuary, MA, U.S.A. Non-conservative distribution of sediments, chlorophyll and particulate organic carbon (POC) along the length of the estuary and up into 1st and 2nd order blind tidal creeks shows an internal source of these materials. 14C dating shows that the most likely non-chlorophyll POC source is peat eroding from the marsh creekbanks. Accretion studies across the marsh platform show a relative pattern of decreasing sediment and increasing organic matter deposition with increasing distance from the flooding creek. 14C dating of surficial fine organic carbon on the marsh platform shows an ancient source of material, most likely the peat eroded from marsh creekbanks. Empirical studies and modeling show that with increased sea-level rise and limited availability of sediments, marsh lateral erosion of estuarine waterbodies will increase thereby augmenting sediment availability and perhaps the survival of the remaining platform marshes.