Potential Predictability Limits of the Global Carbon Cycle

Aaron Spring and Tatiana Ilyina, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Abstract:
The growth rate of atmospheric CO2 on inter-annual time-scales is mainly driven by the response of the land and ocean carbon sinks to climate variability. As of now, it is unknown for how long atmospheric CO2 variations are predictable and how the ocean and land carbon sinks contribute to this predictability of atmospheric CO2.

Using perfect-model simulations representing perfect initialization, which yield an upper bound of predictability in an Earth-System-Model, we show that inter-annual atmospheric CO2 variations are potentially predictable for three years. We find predictability of two years for the annual oceanic CO2 fluxes with areas of higher predictability regionally. Terrestrial CO2 flux is also predictable for two years and dominated by the ENSO-affected tropical forests and mid-latitudes. The isolated effect of temporally accumulated global terrestrial carbon sink predictability on atmospheric CO2 of five years dominates over its oceanic counterpart of 12 years. Therefore the terrestrial carbon cycle limits predictability of atmospheric CO2 concentration.

Our research shows the potential of ESM-based prediction systems to predict near-term variations in atmospheric CO2. These prediction systems can inform policy-makers about the expected natural variations of the global carbon cycle to assess the expected mitigation efforts efficiency within the time-scale of the global stocktakes.

Reference:

Spring and Ilyina (2019). “Predictability Horizons in the Global Carbon Cycle Inferred from a Perfect-Model Framework”. Geophysical Research Letters, submitted manuscript