Seismic Anisotropy: Predictions, Observations, and Interpretations III Posters

Wednesday, 17 December 2014: 1:40 PM-6:00 PM
Chairs:  Thomas Bodin, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, Carlos J Garrido, IACT, Granada, Spain and Andrea Tommasi, University of Montpellier II, Montpellier Cedex 05, France
Primary Conveners:  Thomas Bodin, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
Co-conveners:  Carlos J Garrido, CSIC, IACT, Granada, Spain, Andrea Tommasi, Univ Montpellier 2, Montpellier, France and Michael Kendall, University of Bristol, School of Earth Sciencess, Bristol, United Kingdom
OSPA Liaisons:  Thomas Bodin, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

Pacific Upper Mantle Seismic Anisotropy from the Active-Source Seismic Component of the NoMelt Experiment
Hannah Friendly Mark1, Daniel Lizarralde2, James B Gaherty3, John A Collins2, Greg Hirth4 and Robert L Evans2, (1)MIT/WHOI Joint Program, Woods Hole, MA, United States, (2)WHOI, Woods Hole, MA, United States, (3)Columbia University in the City of New York, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY, United States, (4)Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
Tracking Stress and Hydrothermal Activity Along Oceanic Spreading Centers Using Tomographic Images of Seismic Anisotropy
Robert A Dunn, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Geology and Geophysics, Honolulu, HI, United States, James Andrew Conder, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Geology, Carbondale, IL, United States and Juan Pablo Canales, Woods Hole Oceanographic Inst, Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole, MA, United States
Crustal Anisotropy beneath selected Pacific Ocean-Islands from Harmonic Decomposition of Receiver Functions
Tolulope M Olugboji and Jeffrey J Park, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
A Markov chain Monte Carlo approach to forward modeling anisotropic receiver functions – Application to the eastern North American craton
Erin A Wirth, Maureen D Long and Jun Korenaga, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
SKS splitting beneath the eastern United States from Transportable Array data
John McNamara, Kenneth Jackson and Maureen D Long, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
Shear Wave Splitting and Mantle Deformation beneath Eastern Eurasia and Indo-Australia
Solomon Gerra Cherie, Stephen S Gao, Kelly Hong Liu, Cory A Reed, Fansheng Kong, Ahmed A Elsheikh, Yi Jiang, Dan Wang, Si Wu and Dee P. Leach, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, MO, United States
Crust and Upper Mantle Shear Velocity Structure and Azimuthal Anisotropy of Northeastern Tibet from Rayleigh-wave Two-station Analysis
Yuan Yang, USTC University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China and Huajian Yao, University of Science and Technology of China, Laboratory of Seismology and Physics of Earth’s Interior, Hefei, China
Upper mantle anisotropy structure beneath eastern Tibet and its exploration
Yi Wang1 and Lianxing Wen1,2, (1)USTC University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China, (2)SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, United States
Seismic Anisotropy of the Lithosphere/Asthenosphere System Beneath the Rwenzori Region of the East-African Rift
Benjamin Homuth1, Ulrike Löbl1, Arthur Batte2, Klemens Link3, Celestine Kasereka4 and Georg Rumpker1, (1)Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany, (2)Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda, (3)Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany, (4)Goma Volcano Observatory, Goma, Congo
Anisotropic Structure of the Upper Mantle in the Carpathian-Pannonian Region: From SKS Splitting data and Xenolith Constraints
Goetz Bokelmann, Ehsan Qorbani, Istvan Kovacs and György Falus, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Slab Detachment Under the Eastern Alps Seen By Seismic Anisotropy
Ehsan Qorbani, Irene Bianchi and Goetz Bokelmann, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Upper Mantle Structure of the Alps, Appennines and Adria Regions as Revealed by Shear Wave Splitting: Results from the CIFALPS Project
Simone Salimbeni1, Liang Zhao2, Marco Giovanni Malusa'3, Silvia Pondrelli1 and Stefano Solarino4, (1)Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, sez. Bologna, Bologna, Italy, (2)IGG Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, (3)University Milano-Bicocca, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Milano, Italy, (4)Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Genova, Italy
Complex Anisotropy of Lowermost Mantle Beneath the Southeastern Pacific : Evidence from SKS–SKKS Splitting Discrepancies
Pengcheng Zhou, ITAG Institute of Theoretical and Applied Geophysics, Peking University, Beijing, China
Subslab seismic anisotropy and mantle flow in the western Pacific subduction zones
Cheng-Chien Peng, IONTU Institute of Oceanography National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Ban-Yuan Kuo, Institute of Earth Sciences Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan and Chin-Wu Chen, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Examining Mantle Flow and Anisotropy under Southwest Alaska and Northwest Canada from Multi-layered Shear Wave Splitting
Ana Corbalan Castejon and Derek Schutt, Colorado State University, Geosciences, Fort Collins, CO, United States
Seismic Anisotropy of the Mexican Subduction Zone Based on the Surface Waves, Shear Wave Splitting, and Higher Modes.
Igor Stubailo and Paul Mcewan Davis, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Crust and Mantle Anisotropy Variations from the Coast to Inland In Central and Southern Mexico
Jorge Alberto Castillo, Xyoli Perez-Campos, Allen L Husker and Raul Valenzuela Wong, UNAM National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
Crystal Preferred Orientation of Amphibole Experimentally Deformed in Simple Shear
Byeongkwan Ko and Haemyeong Jung, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
Effective Elastic Response and Associated Seismic Anisotropy of Polar Ices Exhibiting Pronounced Crystallographic Texture, and Containing Air and/or Rock Inclusions
Olivier Castelnau1, Anne Mangeney2, Amandine sergeant-Boy2, Jean-Paul Montagner2, Eleonore Stutzmann2 and Veronique Farra2, (1)CNRS, Paris Cedex 16, France, (2)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France
Clay Mineral Preferred Orientation
Ruarri James Day-Stirrat, Shell Houston, Houston, TX, United States