P41D:
Topography in the Solar System II Posters

Thursday, 18 December 2014: 8:00 AM-12:20 PM
Primary Conveners:  Ross A Beyer, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States
Co-conveners:  Gerald Patterson, Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, United States
OSPA Liaisons:  Gerald Patterson, Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, United States

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

 
Fusion and Visualization of HiRISE Super-Resolution, Shape-from-Shading DTM with MER Stereo 3D Reconstructions
Gerhard Paar1, Jan-Peter Muller2, Yu Tao2, Laurence Tyler3, Christoph Traxler4, Gerd Hesina4, Sanjeev Gupta5, Ben Huber1 and Bernhard Nauschnegg1, (1)Joanneum Research, Graz, Austria, (2)University College London, Mullard Space Science Laboratory, London, United Kingdom, (3)Aberystwyth University, Computer Science, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom, (4)VRVis Forschungs GmbH, Vienna, Austria, (5)Imperial College London, London, SW7, United Kingdom
 
Quantitative topographic analysis as a guide to rover-based research on Mars
Marisa C Palucis1, William E Dietrich1, Timothy J Parker2, Dawn Y Sumner3, Rebecca M. E. Williams4, Alexander Hayes5, Nicolas Mangold6 and Kevin W Lewis7, (1)University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, (2)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States, (4)Planetary Science Institute Tucson, Tucson, AZ, United States, (5)Cornell University, Department of Astronomy, Ithaca, NY, United States, (6)LPGN Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique de Nantes, Nantes Cedex 03, France, (7)Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
 
Valles Marineris as a Cryokarstic Structure Formed by a Giant Dyke System: Support From New Analogue Experiments
Mehmet sinan Ozeren, A M Celal Sengor, Dursun Acar, Semih Can Ülgen and I. Emre Onsel, istanbul technical university, Ayazağa, Istanbul, Turkey
 
The Martian geomorphology as mapped by the Mars Express High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC): Implications for Geological Processes and Climate Conditions.
Thomas Roatsch1, Ralf Jaumann1, Gerhard Neukum2, Daniela Tirsch1, Ernst Hauber3, Harald Hoffmann1, Klaus Gwinner1, Frank Scholten1, Gaetano Di Achille4, Thomas C Duxbury5, Gino Erkeling6, Stefan vanGasselt2, Sanjeev Gupta7, James W Head III8, Harald Hiesinger9, Wing-Huen Ip10, Horst Uwe Keller11, Maarten G Kleinhans12, Thomas Kneisl2, Thomas B McCord13, Peter Muller14, John Murray15, Monica Pondrelli16, Thomas Platz2, Patrick Claude Pinet17, Dennis Reiss9, Angelo Pio Rossi18, Lutz Wendt2, David A Williams19, Nicolas Mangold20 and Tilman Spohn1, (1)German Aerospace Center DLR Berlin, Berlin, Germany, (2)Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany, (3)German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Berlin, Germany, (4)CNR National Institute for Astrophysics, Rome, Italy, (5)George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, United States, (6)Uni Muenster, Muenster, Germany, (7)Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, (8)Brown University, Providence, RI, United States, (9)University of Münster, Münster, Germany, (10)NCU National Central University of Taiwan, Jhongli, Taiwan, (11)Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany, (12)Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands, (13)Bear Fight Institute, Winthrop, WA, United States, (14)Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Dorking, United Kingdom, (15)Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom, (16)University of Chieti-Pescara, Pescara, Italy, (17)IRAP, Toulouse, Italy, (18)Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany, (19)Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States, (20)LPGN Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géodynamique de Nantes, Nantes Cedex 03, France
 
Slopes from Photoclinometry for the Mars InSight Landing Site Selection Process
Ross A Beyer, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, United States; SETI Institute Mountain View, Sagan Center, Mountain View, CA, United States
 
Assessment of Systematic Differences Between the SPC and SPG Vesta Shape Models Derived from the Dawn Mission
Anton Ermakov1, Maria T Zuber1, David E Smith1,2, Carol A Raymond3, Robert W Gaskell4 and Frank Preusker5, (1)Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States, (2)NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (3)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)Planetary Science Institute Tucson, Tucson, AZ, United States, (5)German Aerospace Center DLR Berlin, Department of Planetary Geodesy, Berlin, Germany
 
Uplifts on Venus and Earth: A Principal Component Analysis
Paul R Stoddard, Northern Illinois Univ, Dekalb, IL, United States and Donna M Jurdy, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States
 
A Laser Altimeter for a Planetary Flyby Mission
David E Smith1, Maria T Zuber1, Xiaoli Sun2, John Cavanaugh2, Gregory A Neumann3, Erwan Mazarico1 and Antonio Genova1, (1)Massachusetts Inst Tech, Cambridge, MA, United States, (2)NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD, United States, (3)NASA, Baltimore, MD, United States
 
The Effect of Incidence Angle on Stereo DTM Quality: Simulations in Support of Europa Clipper
Randolph L Kirk1, Elpitha Howington-Kraus1, Trent M Hare1 and Laurent Jorda2, (1)USGS Astrogeology Science Center, Flagstaff, AZ, United States, (2)Observatoire Astrophysique Marseille, Marseille, France
 
Toward comprehensive Titan digital topography construction: A technical demonstration with stereogrammetry and photo/radarclinometry
Jungrack Kim1, Wenhui Wan2, Sungmin Lee1 and YunSoo Choi1, (1)University of Seoul, Seoul, South Korea, (2)RADI Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
 
See more of: Planetary Sciences