G51A:
Cryosphere, Solid Earth, and Sea-Level Interactions and the Next Generation of Glacial Isostatic Models II Posters

Friday, 19 December 2014: 8:00 AM-12:20 PM
Chairs:  Volker Klemann, Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany and Jeanne M Sauber, NASA Goddard SFC, Greenbelt, MD, United States
Primary Conveners:  Jeanne M Sauber, NASA Goddard SFC, Greenbelt, MD, United States
Co-conveners:  Erik R Ivins, JPL/Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States, Wouter van der Wal, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands and Volker Klemann, GFZ German Research Centre, Potsdam, Germany
OSPA Liaisons:  Erik R Ivins, JPL/Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

 
Measurement and Modeling of Cryosphere-Geosphere Interactions in South Central Alaska
Jeanne M Sauber, NASA Goddard SFC, Greenbelt, MD, United States, Shin-Chan Han, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, United States, Scott B Luthcke, Goddard Space Flight Center, Severna Park, MD, United States, Natalia A Ruppert, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, United States and Ronald L Bruhn, Univ Utah, Hansville, WA, United States
 
Featuring lithosphere rheology in models of glacial isostatic adjustment
Volker Klemann1, Magdala Tesauro1,2 and Zdenek Martinec3,4, (1)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (2)Utrecht University, Department of Geosciences, Utrecht, Netherlands, (3)Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, School of Cosmic Physics, Dublin, Ireland, (4)Charles University, Department of Geophysics, Prague, Czech Republic
 
The POLENET-ANET integrated GPS and seismology approach to understanding glacial isostatic adjustment and ice mass change in Antarctica
Terry J Wilson1, Michael G Bevis2, Stephanie Ann Konfal1, Valentina R. Barletta3, Richard C Aster4, Julien A Chaput5, David Heeszel6, Doulgas A Wiens7 and Andrew Jason Lloyd7, (1)Ohio State University Main Campus, Columbus, OH, United States, (2)Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, (3)Technical University of Denmark - Space, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark, (4)Colorado State University, Geosciences Department, Fort Collins, CO, United States, (5)Organization Not Listed, Washington, DC, United States, (6)Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, United States, (7)Washington University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States
 
GPS Measurements of Crustal Motion Indicate 3D GIA Models are Needed to Understand Antarctic Ice Mass Change
Stephanie Ann Konfal1, Terry J Wilson1, Michael G Bevis1, Eric C Kendrick1, Ian W D Dalziel2, Robert Smalley Jr3, Michael J Willis4, David Heeszel5 and Douglas A Wiens6, (1)Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, (2)University of Texas at Austin, Institute for Geophysics, Austin, TX, United States, (3)Univ Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States, (4)Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States, (5)Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, United States, (6)Washington University in St Louis, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, St. Louis, MO, United States
 
Improved GIA correction yields larger Antarctic mass loss.
Isabella Velicogna1, Tyler C Sutterley1, Erik R Ivins2 and Michiel R van den Broeke3, (1)University of California Irvine, Department of Earth System Science, Irvine, CA, United States, (2)JPL/Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
 
Mass balance of Graham Land at present-day and over the past 150 years using GRACE and GNSS station data
Erik R Ivins1, David N Wiese2, Michael M Watkins2, Felix W Landerer3, Alexander Simms4, Dah-Ning Yuan3, Carmen Boening2 and Eugene W Domack5, (1)JPL/Caltech, Pasadena, CA, United States, (2)NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (3)Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, United States, (4)University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States, (5)Hamilton College, Clinton, NY, United States
 
Modelling the Relation between Gravity and Vertical Displacement Change Rates in Formerly Glaciated Areas
Jonas Ågren1, Per-Anders Olsson1, Hans-Georg Scherneck2 and Glenn A. Milne3, (1)Lantmäteriet, Gävle, Sweden, (2)Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, (3)University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
 
Inverting Glacial Isostatic Adjustment beyond linear viscoelasticity using Burgers rheology
Lambert Caron1, Marianne Greff-Lefftz1, Luce Fleitout2, Laurent Metivier3 and Hélène Rouby2,4, (1)Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, Paris, France, (2)Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris, Paris, France, (3)IGN Institut National de l'Information Géographique et Forestière, Paris Cedex 13, France, (4)Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
 
Effects of Sediment Loading in Northern Europe During the Last Glacial
MP IJpelaar, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 5612, Netherlands and Wouter van der Wal, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
 
Effect of Uncertainty in Viscosity Maps from Seismology on GIA Modelling
Wouter van der Wal and Ward Stolk, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
 
A New Approach for Modelling Post-Glacial Sea Level
David Al-Attar, University of Cambridge, Bullard Labs, Cambridge, United Kingdom and Jeroen Tromp, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
 
Variations in Mid-Ocean Ridge CO2 Emissions Driven By Glacial Cycles
Jonathan M Burley, University of Oxford, Oxford, 0X1, United Kingdom, Richard F Katz, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom and Peter J Huybers, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
 
See more of: Geodesy