G51B:
Gravity Data and Geoid Modeling: Methods, Theories, and Opportunities II Posters

Friday, 19 December 2014: 8:00 AM-12:20 PM
Chairs:  Theresa Damiani, NOAA- Nat-l Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States and Vicki A Childers, NOAA, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
Primary Conveners:  Theresa Damiani, NOAA- Nat-l Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
Co-conveners:  Vicki A Childers, NOAA, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States, David Avalos-Naranjo, INEGI, Aguascalientes, Mexico and Thomas J Johnson, NGA, Burke, VA, United States
OSPA Liaisons:  Theresa Damiani, NOAA- Nat-l Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States

Abstracts Submitted to this Session:

 
Calculation of Stokes’ Integral on the Sphere Using 1D FFT
Elena M. Mazurova, MIIGAiK, SSGA, Moscow, Russia
 
Preliminary results of the Geoid Slope Validation Survey 2014 in Iowa
Yan Ming Wang, Collin Becker, Steve Breidenbach, Charles Geoghegan, Dan Martin, Daniel Winester, Timothy Hanson, Gerald L Mader and Mark C Eckl, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
 
Evaluation of Systematic Differences Between the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 and Release 5 GOCE Product
Daniel R Roman, National Geodetic Survey, SRSD, Silver Spring, MD, United States and Xiaopeng Li, DSTt@NGS, Silver Spring, MD, United States
 
A hybrid geoid for the U.S. using empirical Bayesian kriging
Kevin M Kelly and Konstantin Krivoruchko, ESRI, Redlands, CA, United States
 
New geoid of Greenland – a case study of terrain and ice effects, GOCE and local sea level data
Rene Forsberg and Tim Jensen, Technical University of Denmark - Space, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
 
Redetermination of the precise gravity fields around the Japanese Antarctic Station, Syowa, and evaluation of GOCE EGMs
Yoichi Fukuda, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, Yoshifumi Nogi, NIPR National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo, Japan and Kazuya Matsuzaki, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Geophysics, Kyoto, Japan
 
KGEOID12: A new hybrid geoid model in Korea
Dong-Ha Lee and Sunhui Sim, University of North Alabama, Geography, Florence, AL, United States
 
Marine Gravity Measurements for Geoid Determination and Height System Unification in the FAMOS Project
Martin Lidberg1, Jonas Ågren1, Benjamin Hell2, Gunter Liebsch3, Christoph Foerste4, Jaakko Makinen5, Hartmut Wziontek6, Markku J. Poutanen5, Mirjam Bilker-Koivula5, Gabriel Strykowski7 and Per-Anders Olsson1, (1)Lantmäteriet, Gävle, Sweden, (2)Swedish Maritime Administration, Norrköping, Sweden, (3)Bundesamt fur Kartographie und Geodäsie, Leipzig, Germany, (4)Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Potsdam, Germany, (5)Finnish Geodetic Institute, Masala, Finland, (6)BKG, Leipzig, Germany, (7)National Space Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
 
Sonmicat: Sea Level Observation System of Catalonia
Juan J Martinez-Benjamin1, Assumpcio Termens2, Antonio Ruiz2 and Silvia Gonzalez Lopez3, (1)Polytechnic University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain, (2)Institut Cartographic and Geologic of Cataloni, Barcelona, Spain, (3)Mapping & Co, Barcelona, Spain
 
Precise Astronomical Azimuth Determination By Qdaedalus System to the Sun, Moon, and Planets in Daytime Conditions
Lajos Völgyesi1, Gyula Tóth1, Beat Bürki2 and Sébastien Guillaume2, (1)Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Geodesy and Surveying, Budapest, Hungary, (2)ETH Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
 
Some Interesting Facts about Correlation Between Gravity Anomalies and Heights with Implications Towards the Correction Density Estimation
Ján Mikuška1, Ivan Marušiak1, Pavol Zahorec2, Juraj Papčo3, Roman Pasteka4 and Miroslav Bielik4, (1)G-trend, s.r.o., Bratislava, Slovakia, (2)The Geophysical Institute of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia, (3)Slovak Technical University, Bratislava, Slovakia, (4)Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
 
Dynamic Effects in Gravimetry: An Assessment of the Current State of Knowledge
Theresa Damiani, NOAA- Nat-l Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
 
Assessing New Airborne Gravimetry Collected over New Zealand
Matthew Amos1, Jack McCubbine2, Fabio Caratori Tontini3 and Rachelle Winefield1, (1)Land Information New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand, (2)Victoria University of Wellington, School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Wellington, New Zealand, (3)GNS Science, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
 
An Improved Platform Levelling System for Airborne Gravity Meters.
Nigel Brady, NOAA Denver, DENVER, CO, United States
 
Use of Crossovers to Evaluate Airborne Gravity Data
Sandra A Preaux and Carly Weil, NOAA, Boulder, CO, United States
 
First Attempt of Applying Factor Analysis in Moving Base Gravimetry
Xiaopeng Li, Organization Not Listed, Washington, DC, United States and Daniel R Roman, National Geodetic Survey, SRSD, Silver Spring, MD, United States
 
Requirements analysis of airborne gravity gradiometry on moving-based platform
Liangcheng Tu, Zhu Li and Wenjie Wu, Institute of Geophysics, School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
 
Absolute Gravity Datum in the Age of Cold Atom Gravimeters
Vicki A Childers, NOAA, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States and Mark C Eckl, National Geodetic Survey, Silver Spring, MD, United States
 
General Adjustment of the Fundamental Gravity Network in Mexico, Preliminary Results.
David Avalos-Naranjo1,2, Spiros D Pagiatakis3, Apolo Alvarado-Cortez1, Petr Vanicek2 and Marcelo C Santos2, (1)INEGI National Institute of Statistics and Geography, Aguascalientes, Mexico, (2)University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada, (3)York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
 
Gravity Change in Finland 1962-2010 from the Comparison of Legacy Relative Measurements with New Absolute Measurements Using the A10-020 Gravimeter
Jaakko Makinen1, Marcin Sekowski2, Jan S Krynski2, Jaakko Kuokkanen1, Jyri Naranen1, Arttu Raja-Halli1, Hannu E O Ruotsalainen1, Heikki Virtanen1 and Mirjam Bilker-Koivula1, (1)Finnish Geodetic Institute, Masala, Finland, (2)Institute of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw, Poland
 
Spatial and Temporal Variability of Water Storage in Dolomite Karst from Gravity Measurements
Cédric Champollion, Benjamin Fores, Jean Chery, Nicolas Le Moigne, Ouail Khairoun, Erik Doerflinger and Philippe Vernant, Laboratoire Geosciences, UMR 5243, Montpellier, France
 
A Re-Evaluation of the Relativistic Redshift on Frequency Standards at NIST, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Nikolaos K Pavlis, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, Washington, DC, United States and Marc A Weiss, National Institute of Standards and Technology Boulder, Time and Frequency Division, Boulder, CO, United States
 
See more of: Geodesy