Major role of nutrient supply in the control of picophytoplankton community structure

Beatriz Mouriño1, Susana Agusti2, Antonio Bode3, Pedro Cermeno4, Paloma Chouciño1, José C. B. da Silva5, Bieito Fernández-Castro1, Josep Gasol4, Miguel Gil Coto6,7, Rocío Graña6, Mikel Latasa3, Luis Lubián8, Emilio Marañón1, Xose Anxelu Moran9, Enrique Moreno10, Víctor Moreira-Coello1, José Luis Otero-Ferrer1, Manuel Ruiz Villarreal11, Renate Scharek3, Sergio M Vallina12, Marta Varela11 and Marina Villamaña1, (1)University of Vigo, Spain, (2)King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Red Sea Research Center, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia, (3)Instituto Español de Oceanografía, (4)Marine Sciences Institute (ICM - CSIC), Barcelona, Spain, (5)University of Porto, Department of Geosciences, Environment and Spatial Planning (DGAOT) & CIIMAR – Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, Porto, Portugal, (6)IIM-CSIC, Vigo, Spain, (7)Ins, (8)Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Cádiz, (9)King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Red Sea Research Center, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia, (10)University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain, (11)IEO, A Coruña, Spain, (12)Instituto de Ciencias del Mar, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Barcelona, Spain
Abstract:
The Margalef´s mandala (1978) is a simplified bottom-up control model that explains how mixing and nutrient concentration determine the composition of marine phytoplankton communities. Due to the difficulties of measuring turbulence in the field, previous attempts to verify this model have applied different proxies for nutrient supply, and very often used interchangeably the terms mixing and stratification. Moreover, because the mandala was conceived before the discovery of smaller phytoplankton groups (picoplankton <2 µm), it describes only the succession of vegetative phases of microplankton. In order to test the applicability of the classical mandala to picoplankton groups, we used a multidisciplinary approach including specifically designed field observations supported by remote sensing, database analyses, and modeling and laboratory chemostat experiments. Simultaneous estimates of nitrate diffusive fluxes, derived from microturbulence observations, and picoplankton abundance collected in more than 200 stations, spanning widely different hydrographic regimes, showed that the contribution of eukaryotes to picoautotrophic biomass increases with nutrient supply, whereas that of picocyanobacteria shows the opposite trend. These findings were supported by laboratory and modeling chemostat experiments that reproduced the competitive dynamics between picoeukaryote sand picocyanobacteria as a function of changing nutrient supply. Our results indicate that nutrient supply controls the distribution of picoplankton functional groups in the ocean, further supporting the model proposed by Margalef.